CAPTIONING MAY 4, 2010 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ***This is not an official, verbatim transcript of the ***following meeting. It should be used for informational ***purposes only. This document has not been edited; ***therefore, there may be additions, deletions, or words ***that did not translate. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING. WELCOME TO OUR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEETING FOR MAY 4th, 2010. WOULD YOU PLEASE STAND FOR PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION. [PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE] HEAVENLY FATHER, AGAIN WE THANK YOU FOR THE MANY BLESSINGS THAT YOU'VE GIVEN US AND FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO LIVE HERE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. WE ASK THAT YOU GUIDE US TODAY AS WE DO THE WORK FOR THE CITIZENS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. PLEASE PROTECT OUR YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE IN HARM'S WAY THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. IN YOUR NAME WE PRAY. AMEN. >> AMEN. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. FIRST I WANT TO CONGRATULATE THE MPO BOARD FOR THIS AWARD THAT WE RECEIVED THIS PAST WEEK FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM, AND THIS IS GIVEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ALTHOUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION ISN'T THE ONE THAT DECIDES WHO GETS THE VARIOUS AWARDS, SO WE WERE -- WE WERE VERY FORTUNATE IN RECEIVING AND VERY HONORED TO HAVE THIS AWARD GIVEN TO US FOR OUR MPO BOARD, AND I WANT TO THANK THE BOARD FOR ALL THE WORK THAT YOU'VE DONE TO -- TO MAKE THIS POSSIBLE, SO WITH THAT, I WANT TO SAY HOW -- HOW PROUD WE WERE AND HONORED WE WERE TO RECEIVE THIS AWARD. I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME TWO NEW MEMBERS OF OUR MPO BOARD. WE HAVE LINDA SAUL-SENA BACK WITH US FROM THE CITY OF TAMPA CITY COUNCIL, TAMPA, AND SHE'S REPLACING MARY MULHERN, AND WE HAVE JOHN WHEAT WITH US, WHO IS REPLACING LOUIS MILLER FROM THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY. WELCOME -- WELCOME TO THE MPO BOARD. OKAY. OKAY. DO WE -- IS THERE ANY PUBLIC INPUT ON ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA? >> YES, WE HAVE TWO. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. NANCY. >> GOOD MORNING. NANCY CASTELLANO, 5900 CENTRAL AVENUE, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA. I AM A BOARD MEMBER FOR THE QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HERE TO SPEAK TO YOU THIS MORNING ABOUT YOUR ACTION ITEM NUMBER "C," THE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM. QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING THROUGH THE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM. QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES RANKED SIX OUT OF EIGHT. FIVE PROJECTS WERE FUNDED -- RECOMMENDED FUNDING FOR 100% WITH THE REMAINING FUNDING GOING TO THE PINELLAS MPO FOR PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. TWO WERE TOTALLY THROWN OUT OF THE RUNNING. SO WE CAME IN AGAIN SIXTH. QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES IS ASKING YOU PLEASE LOOK AT THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED BOARD RECOMMENDATION AND VOTE TO FOLLOW THAT RECOMMENDATION AND SEND THE APPLICATION BACK TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR REEVALUATION. FUNDS JUST NEED TO SLIGHTLY BE REDISTRIBUTED, AND THEN ALL THE PROGRAMS WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS WORTHWHILE FUNDING SOURCE. I WANT TO MAKE A FEW COMMENTS AND POINT OUT HOW QUALITY OF LIFE SERVICES MEET AND SURPASS ALL OF THE NEW FREEDOM CRITERIA AND ALSO HOW IT BENEFITS THE TRUE SPIRIT OF THE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM. THROUGHOUT OUR APPLICATION PROCESS WE INCLUDED INDIVIDUALS AND AGENCIES THAT WERE ABLE TO IDENTIFY UNMET NEEDS AND WHO WOULD BE WILLING TO PARTNER TO MAKE THIS A SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM. FOR EXAMPLE, WE INCLUDED CITIZENS ADVOCATES, WE INCLUDED THE AREA AGENCY ON AGING, WE INCLUDED THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CTC, WE INCLUDED LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES, AND WE INCLUDED COUNTY-BASED NONPROFIT WITH PRIVATE FUNDING SOURCES. THE UNMET AND UNFUNDED NEEDS WERE THE FOCAL POINT OF THIS NEW FREEDOM RIDERS PROGRAM. TWO, WE INCLUDED CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND PARTNERS OF NONGOVERNMENTAL FUNDING TO MATCH THE NEEDS OF THE NEW FREEDOM RIDERS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS. WE WERE REQUIRED TO ACTUALLY MATCH QUITE A BIT OF THE DOLLARS THAT WERE BEING FUNDED. QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES IS AWARE THAT EDUCATION AND TRAINING AND OUTREACH ARE ALL IMPORTANT COMPONENTS OF ANY PROGRAM; HOWEVER, WE ALSO BELIEVE THAT THE RUBBER NEEDS TO MEET THE ROAD AND THAT TRIPS NEED TO BE PROVIDED, NOT JUST EDUCATION, PUBLIC OUTREACH. PLEASE LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION, AND IF TRAINING AND CONSTRUCTION ARE THE ONLY THINGS NEW FREEDOM IS ABOUT, THEN THE RANKING SHOULD STAND; HOWEVER, QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES FIRMLY BELIEVES THE GUIDELINES INTENDED FOR THE NEW FREEDOM FUNDS ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SERVICES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS BEYOND THOSE REQUIRED BY AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICE -- AND I'LL CLOSE -- NANCY CASTELLANO AND OTHER BOARD MEMBERS -- I, NANCY CASTELLANO, AND OTHER BOARD MEMBERS OF QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES ARE TOTALLY COMMITTED TO MATCHING DECADES OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE, PRIVATE RESOURCES WITH THE NEW FREEDOM FUNDING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR THOSE THAT NEED THE MOST AND TO CLOSE THE GAP OF HEALTH CARE AND TRANSPORTATION DISPARITIES FOR THOSE WITH UNMET TRANSPORTATION NEEDS. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, NANCY. OKAY. NEXT WE HAVE MICHAEL JACOB MOSES. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: MR. CHAIRMAN. >> MICHAEL JACOB MOSES, 5900 CENTRAL AVENUE, ST. PETE, FLORIDA. I'D LIKE TO -- >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: WE'LL ADDRESS THAT LATER? >>JOE AFFRONTI: EXCUSE ME. YEAH. THAT'S COMING UP ON THE AGENDA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: GO AHEAD. I'M SORRY. >> OKAY. MICHAEL JACOB MOSES. I'M A BOARD MEMBER OF QUALITY OF LIFE COMMUNITY SERVICES, A 501(C)(3) NONPROFIT. I'M HERE TO SPEAK TO YOU ON THE NEW FREEDOM AGENDA ITEM, AND FOR A MOMENT I JUST WANT TO SPEAK TO SOME OF MY PAST. FOR OVER 20 YEARS I'VE OWNED AND OPERATED HEALTH CARE BUSINESSES HERE IN THE TAMPA BAY MARKET, CARING FOR FRAIL ELDERLY AND ADULT DISABLED PEOPLE. THE PRIMARY INTENT OF NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND TO SPECIFICALLY PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PROJECTS PLANNED, DESIGNED, AND CARRIED OUT TO MEET SPECIAL NEEDS OF ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS. AS QUOTED IN THE AGENDA IN YOUR OWN PACKETS, THE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SERVICES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS BEYOND THOSE REQUIRED BY THE AMERICANS CAN DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. PURSUANT TO THOSE GUIDELINES, OUR NEW FREEDOM RIDERS PROGRAM IS PLANNED TO OFFER TRIPS TO THE TRANSPORTATION UNDERSERVED, DISABLED INDIVIDUALS TO ENSURE THEY CAN HAVE FULL PARTICIPATION IN SOCIETY. AFTER REVIEWING THE OTHER APPLICANTS, WE NOTICED THAT 70% OF THE DOLLARS AWARDED ARE GOING TO TRAINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE WHILE 30% ARE GOING TO OTHER TRIPS, MOST OF WHICH ARE IN PASCO COUNTY. NOT TO MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR RIDER EDUCATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, THE NEW FREEDOM RIDERS PROJECT ADDRESSES THE MOST URGENT NEED OF THE PEOPLE BEING SERVED, TRIPS. OUR GRANT ALSO ADDRESSES MANY OF THE PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED IN THE PUBLIC OUTREACH SUMMARY FROM THE 2007 TRICOUNTY ACCESS PLAN. AT THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED BOARD MEETING THERE WAS STRONG COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE HANDLED ANOTHER WAY. I REALIZE THESE ARE TRYING TIMES FOR EVERYBODY ECONOMICALLY, ESPECIALLY GOVERNMENTAL AND QUASI- GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. CONSIDERING THESE TRYING TIMES, WE NOW HAVE A NONPROFIT AND PRIVATE FUNDING WILLING TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND DO SOMETHING FOR THE RESIDENTS AND CITIZENS OF THE TAMPA BAY MARKET, YET WE'RE BEING SENT BACK TO THE DUGOUT. LADIES AND GENTLEMAN, NEEDY TRAVELERS CANNOT BENEFIT ANYMORE FROM FIXED ROUTES AND MORE ADA PADS. WE HAVE INCORPORATED THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CTC TO HELP US WITH THIS. WE'RE WORKING TO PROVIDE TRIPS FOR EVENING, WEEKENDS, NONFIXED ROUTES, CHAIN TRIPS. TAKING SOMEONE TO AND FROM THE DOCTOR IS NOT ENOUGH FOR AN ELDERLY PERSON. THEY MUST GET TO THE GROCERY STORE, THEY MUST GET THEIR NUTRITIONAL NEEDS MET, THEY MUST GO TO THE PHARMACY, TAKING THEM TO QUALITY-OF-LIFE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS SUCH AS CULTURAL EVENTS, BEAUTY PARLORS, GROCERY STORES, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY THEIR PLACES OF WORSHIP. SOME HAVE SAID THAT OUR QUEST MIGHT BE A LITTLE TOO AGGRESSIVE TO BEGIN WITH. WE'RE WILLING TO SCALE IT BACK INTO A PILOT PROGRAM TO HELP THOSE PEOPLE WHO NEED THESE TRIPS SO BADLY. OUR REQUEST IS A TRUE NEW FREEDOM REQUEST. IT'S NEW, IT'S INNOVATIVE, AND ITS INTENT IS CLEAR AS A BELL. IT'S TO GIVE TRIPS TO THOSE WHO NEED IT. NOW THE DECISION RESTS WITH YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN TO SEE IF JUST SOME OF THESE NEW FREEDOM DOLLARS CAN GO TO TRIPS FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY RESIDENTS. WE ASK YOU TO SUPPORT THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO SEND THIS BACK TO PLANNING. TOGETHER, PLEASE LET'S MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR THOSE WHO NEED IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE. THIS IS GOING TO BE COMING UP UNDER 4-C ON OUR AGENDA, SO WE'LL BE ABLE TO DISCUSS ANY COMMENTS THAT WE HAVE AT THAT POINT. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. OKAY. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COUNCIL -- I'M SORRY. JOE AMON WITH THE CAC. JOE, YOU HAVE A REPORT? >> JOE AMON. SORRY ABOUT MY VOICE. I'M HAVING THIS PROBLEM. I DON'T KNOW. IT'S THE POLLEN OR SOMETHING. JOE AMON, CHAIR OF THE CAC. MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE MPO, WE MET -- THE CAC MET ON MAY 4th -- I'M SORRY, WE DIDN'T MEET ON MAY -- WHEN DID WE MEET? WE MET ON APRIL THE 4th. NO, I DON'T REMEMBER WHEN WE MET. SORRY. [LAUGHTER] IT SAYS HERE MEETING ON MAY 4th. >> [INAUDIBLE] >> SORRY. LET ME START OVER AGAIN. LET'S START WITH TALKING ABOUT MR. AL STEENSON, MEMBER OF THE CAC FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. AL LEFT US, ASKED TO STEP DOWN FROM THE CAC. WE REGRETTABLY ALLOWED HIM TO DO THAT. WE WISH WE COULD STILL HAVE HIM, BUT HE DECIDED TO DO OTHER THINGS. HE REPRESENTED THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY'S POSITION AS WELL AS THE GANDY AREA VERY WELL FOR HIS TIME ON THE CAC. HE WAS VERY ACTIVE ON THE CAC, SO WE GAVE HIM A PLAQUE AND WISHED HIM WELL AND INVITED HIM TO COME BACK AT ANY TIME HE WANTED TO, AT LEAST FROM A MEMBER'S INTEREST STANDPOINT OR A CITIZEN'S INTEREST STANDPOINT COME IN AND TALK TO US, AND I BELIEVE AL WILL. HE'S A VERY ACTIVE INDIVIDUAL. MOVE ON TO PUBLIC INTEREST. MR. STEENSON ALSO, AFTER HE GOT HIS AWARD, DECIDED TO TELL US ABOUT A SIGN NOT FUNCTIONING. DOWN AT GANDY BOULEVARD THERE'S A NEW MESSAGE SIGN DOWN THERE AND IT'S APPARENTLY NOT BEING UTILIZED, AND HE RECOMMENDED THAT THEY PUT IT ON-LINE AND AT LEAST PUT SOMETHING ON IT TO -- SOMETHING AS SIMPLE AS NO TRUCKS ON BAYSHORE, BUT AT LEAST IT'S BEEN -- IT'S DOWN THERE, IT'S BEEN PAID FOR, AND LET'S PUT IT TO USE. MR. LEDUC INFORMED THE MEMBERS THAT FDOT HAS STARTED TO WORK ON THE CROSSTOWN CORRECTOR. WE'RE GLAD TO HEAR THAT. HE ALSO TALKED ABOUT TAMPA BAY RAYS STADIUM IS MOST INTERESTED IN KNOWING WHERE THE STADIUM MIGHT -- IF IT'S BEING CONSIDERED, WHAT IMPACT IT WOULD HAVE ON THE ROADS IN THE AREA. THAT'S MAYBE A LITTLE BIT PREMATURE TO GET INVOLVED IN THAT. A REQUEST WAS MADE FOR BRIEFING ON A FUTURE CAC MEETING FOR THE HISTORY OF THE EAST-WEST CONNECTOR. THIS IS -- IN YOUR REPORT IT'S WRITTEN AS VETERANS I-75 NEAR LUTZ. THAT'S NOT ALL INCLUSIVE. WHAT MR. LEDUC WAS INTERESTED IN IS LOOKING AT THE ROAD FROM BRUCE B. DOWNS ALL THE WAY BACK OVER TO THE VETERANS. THAT ROADWAY WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO ACT AS AN EAST-WEST CONNECTOR, AND FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS IT HASN'T MADE IT. WE -- MR. LEDUC WANTS TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT AGAIN, AND HE'S ASKING FOR MORE INFORMATION ON IT. HOPEFULLY WE'LL BE ABLE TO DO THAT OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. THERE WAS A DISCUSSION BY CAC AND THE MPO STAFF ON THE RAIL ALIGNMENT PROPOSED FOR BRUCE B. DOWNS AND THE BENEFIT OF THE RAIL DOWN THE CENTER. ALSO CONSIDERATION OF SIX LANES VERSUS EIGHT LANES, AND I HAPPENED TO GO TO THE LAST MEETING OF THE BRUCE B. DOWNS AREA CONCERNING THE WIDENING, AND I -- I'M PERSONALLY A PROPONENT OF THE EIGHT LANES. I KNOW THERE'S A NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT -- RIGHT NOW IT'S A MIXED BAG. SOME PEOPLE WANT THE EIGHT LANES, SOME PEOPLE WANT THE SIX LANES. I THINK THE EIGHT LANES IS APPROPRIATE. ACTION ITEMS. 2010 HILLSBOROUGH MPO JOINT CERTIFICATION. STAFF EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS A INTERIM-YEAR CERTIFICATION THAT WAS CONDUCTED JOINTLY WITH THE FDOT. THE CAC PASSED A MOTION RECOMMENDING THE MPO BOARD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN THE 2010 JOINT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT. ITEM "B" WAS A DRAFT UPWP FISCAL YEAR '11 AND '12. AN UPDATED VERSION OF THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM WAS DISTRIBUTED AND REFLECTED CHANGES FROM THE PRIOR MONTHS. CAC APPROVED THE DRAFT UPWP AND FORWARDED IT TO THE MPO FOR YOUR APPROVAL. JOBS ACCESS AND NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM PROJECT PRIORITIZATION. THE STAFF PRESENTED AN OVERVIEW OF THE JOBS ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM, AND THE TRANSPORT -- THAT PROGRAM TRANSPORTS ELIGIBLE LOW-INCOME INDIVIDUALS TO AND FROM JOBS AND ACTIVITIES RELATED TO EMPLOYMENT; AND THE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM WHICH IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SERVICES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATES FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS. THE OUTCOME WAS FOUR APPLICANTS WERE DEEMED ELIGIBLE FOR THE JARC FUNDS AND SIX FOR THE NEW FREEDOM FUNDS. AN ESTIMATED 1.5 MILLION IS AVAILABLE IN EACH FUND FOR ALL THREE COUNTIES, AND FOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE ELIGIBILITY OF FUNDING, THE PRIORITY RANKING OF PROJECTS WAS APPROVED FOR FORWARDING TO THE MPO. BUT I MUST TELL YOU THAT WHAT I HEARD JUST A FEW MINUTES AGO WE WERE NOT PRIVY TO. MR. PLOTKIN WAS NOT AT OUR MEETING, THE CAC MEETING. I THINK IF HE WOULD HAVE, WE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE HEARD WHAT MS. CASTELLANO HAD SAID UP HERE, AND WE DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE TO HEAR THAT. I'M NOT SURE IT WOULD HAVE CHANGED OUR OPINION, BUT STILL, THAT'S A GOOD PIECE OF INFORMATION FOR YOU TO CONSIDER. ITEM "D" WAS A T.I.P. AMENDMENT. FDOT STAFF REQUESTED AN AMENDMENT FOR A SIDEWALK PROJECT ON DALE MABRY, AND OF COURSE, THE CAC IS ALWAYS BIG ON THE SIDEWALKS, SO WE PASSED -- THE CAC APPROVED THE T.I.P. AMENDMENT AND FORWARDED IT TO YOU. A LIST OF STATUS REPORTS. THE T.I.P. KICKOFF FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 AND '12, DISCUSSION ON GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS, AND THE PROCESSES THAT THE MPO WILL GO THROUGH FOR A GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS, I BRING THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE I THINK THE MPO HAS DONE A GREAT JOB OF GETTING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. A PRESENTATION WAS MADE ON HOW EFFECTIVE THE MPO HAS BEEN OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS AT REACHING OUT TO THE PUBLIC FOR INPUT ON MPO PLANS AND STUDIES. AN EXAMPLE OF A VERY SUCCESSFUL APPROACH WERE THE TWO TOWN CALL MEETINGS HELD DURING THE LRTP UPDATE. 7,000 INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATED IN THAT. UNBELIEVABLE. GREAT NUMBER. THE MPO ALSO HELD OVER 200 MEETINGS AND EVENTS THROUGHOUT THE TWO-YEAR PERIOD. THAT'S SOME -- WHAT WE BELIEVE IS SOME GREAT ACTIVITY, AND WE APPLAUD THE MPO FOR THEIR WORK. RAIL PURPOSE AND NEEDS, THE MPO STAFF PRESENTED THE NINE RAIL CORRIDORS INCLUDED IN THE 2035 LRTP NEEDED TO MEET THE LONG-RANGE TRAVEL DEMANDS. THERE WILL BE A LOT MORE DISCUSSION ON RAIL TO COME. UNFINISHED BUSINESS. MPO STAFF BROUGHT TO THE CAC'S ATTENTION THAT IN MARCH THE MPO BOARD APPROVED A T.I.P. AMENDMENT FROM HART TO USE 800,000 OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED TRIP FUNDS TO SUPPORT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR RAIL. [INCOMPREHENSIBLE] AND TO REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL 900,000 IN TRIP FUNDS. OTHER BUSINESS. A REQUEST WAS MADE TO HAVE MAPS ON HAND WHEN MEMBERS DISCUSSED -- WHAT HAPPENS IS PEOPLE BRING STUFF TO THE CAC AND WE'RE NOT AS KNOWLEDGEABLE AS OTHER BOARD MEMBERS, OTHER MPO MEMBERS TRULY, AND THESE -- THESE ARE SOMETIMES TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS, AND WHAT WE DON'T HAVE IS A MAP SHOWING US WHAT THE DATA ACTUALLY IS. MAYBE WE ALL KNOW DALE MABRY, BUT WHEN SOMEBODY ASKS FOR A ROAD OR A SIDEWALK ON DALE MABRY, WE'D LIKE TO KNOW WHERE IT IS AND SEE IT ON A MAP SO WE CAN PUT OUR FINGER ON IT. THAT HASN'T BEEN HAPPENING, BUT WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THAT IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. AND LASTLY, LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. WE'RE ASKING FOR A LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. VERY IMPORTANT WITH ALL THAT HAPPENED IN THE PAST COUPLE MONTHS. SO WITH THAT, THAT'S BASICALLY THE END OF MY REPORT. THE NEXT MEETING IS MAY 12th AT 1:15 P.M. IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOARDROOM. THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: ANY QUESTIONS OF JOE? YES, KEVIN. >>KEVIN BECKNER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. MR. AMON, COULD YOU CLARIFY FOR US WHEN WE WERE GOING -- TALKING ABOUT THAT -- THE JOBS ACCESS AND NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM PRIORITIES, YOUR STATEMENT THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT YOU DID NOT HEAR THE STATEMENTS THAT WERE GIVEN TODAY, WAS THAT BECAUSE, I MEAN, THERE WAS NOT A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THAT GROUP THAT WAS THERE OR WHAT'S -- >> CORRECT. NORMALLY LEONARD PLOTKIN -- LEONARD IS A VERY ACTIVE OF OUR COMMITTEE, AND I'M SURE AS IMPORTANT AS THIS WAS, WE MAY HAVE HEARD SOME MORE INFORMATION THAN WHAT WE HEARD, BUT WE DID NOT HEAR -- I DIDN'T HEAR AND I'M SITTING IN THE MEETING -- THE LEVEL OF DETAIL THAT MS. CASTELLANO PRESENTED, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT WILL AFFECT US, BUT IT MAY HAVE -- IT MAY HAVE BEEN IMPORTANT TO OUR DECISION. WE DIDN'T HAVE THE DATA. WE DIDN'T HEAR IT THE WAY IT WAS PRESENTED THIS MORNING. THE BOARD -- THE CAC DID VOTE TO PUSH IT -- PUSH THE PROGRAM FORWARD EXACTLY THE WAY IT'S PRESENTED, WHICH YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE UP IN A LITTLE BIT. >>KEVIN BECKNER: WAS THERE SOMEBODY PRESENT THERE TO PRESENT IT, OR WAS THE -- I GUESS MY QUESTION -- >> STAFF. >>KEVIN BECKNER: -- WAS THE OPPORTUNITY THERE, OR WE DIDN'T HEAR FROM THE GROUP UP UNTIL THIS POINT? IS THAT -- >> THAT'S CORRECT. >>KEVIN BECKNER: OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MR. AMON? IF NOT, THANK YOU SO MUCH, JOE. >> THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANKS FOR ALL THE HARD WORK. OKAY. NEXT, NED BAIER FOR THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. >>NED BAIER: GOOD MORNING. NED BAIER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU THE REPORT FROM THE MPO'S TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON APRIL 19th WITH THE AGENCY STAFF. WE REVIEWED YOUR THREE ACTION ITEMS BEFORE YOU TODAY, THE FIRST BEING THE MPO ANNUAL CERTIFICATION. THE MPO STAFF PRESENTED THE RESULTS OF THIS YEAR'S CERTIFICATION REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF BEST PRACTICES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS, AND THIS PLANNING PROCESS REVIEW IS DONE ANNUALLY TO CERTIFY THAT THE MPO IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE RULES THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PROCESS WITH FDOT DISTRICT 7 AND MPO STAFF. THE TAC PASSED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE MPO BOARD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE JOINT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT. THE SECOND ACTION ITEM WAS THE DRAFT UPWP, THE MPO'S WORK PROGRAM FOR 2011 AND 2012, AND THE COMMITTEE DID SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON -- ON THIS ITEM. THIS UPWP DOCUMENTS THE FEDERAL- AND STATE-FUNDED PLANNING FOR THE MPO, HART, FDOT, AND ALSO DEFINES MAJOR PLANNING WORK TASKS THAT WILL BE UNDERTAKEN OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS. THE AMOUNT OF MONEY IS 3.4 MILLION IN THE 2011 BUDGET INCLUDES SOME CARRYOVER MONEY FROM THE PRECEDING YEAR. THERE WAS A DETAILED DESCRIPTION MADE BY MPO STAFF, VIRTUALLY WENT PAGE BY PAGE THROUGH THE WORK PROGRAM, THE DIFFERENT PLANNING ITEMS. A COUPLE OF THE AGENCY COMMENTS INCLUDED THE CITY OF TAMPA REQUESTED TRAFFIC COUNTS BE INCLUDED IN SOME TRAFFIC DATA INFORMATION THAT WILL BE COLLECTED BY THE MPO. THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMMENTS ALSO REQUESTED FUNDS BE CONSIDERED FOR TRAFFIC COUNTING THIS YEAR ON THE COUNTY ROADS FOR TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY PURPOSES. THE COUNTY ALSO REQUESTED THAT FUNDS BE CONSIDERED FOR WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION EFFORTS UNDERWAY BY THE CITY AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. ALSO THE CITY STAFF RECOMMENDED THAT MORE PLANNING FUNDS BE INCLUDED FOR COMPLETE STREETS AND OTHER WORKS -- WORK ON SIDEWALKS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, OTHER INITIATIVES MADE BY THE CITY. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQUESTED THAT ADDITIONAL FUNDS BE ALLOCATED TOWARDS AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE INITIATIVES OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS THAT THE MPO WILL BE REACTING TO OVER THIS NEXT YEAR. AND THERE WILL BE A COMPLETE REPORT OF THE AGENCY COMMENTS DURING YOUR -- DURING YOUR AGENDA ITEM, BUT WE DID PASS A MOTION TO CONCUR WITH THE DRAFT UPWP AND JUST FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THE AGENCY COMMENTS THAT YOU WILL RECEIVE DURING THE REPORT. THE -- THE FINAL ACTION ITEM WAS THE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM, THE JOBS ACCESS PROGRAM, AND I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT ALTHOUGH WE CONCURRED WITH THE -- THE REPORT MADE BY MPO STAFF AND ON THE RANKINGS, THE -- THE TECHNICAL STAFF WAS NOT REALLY PART OF THE EVALUATION. MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE WAS MADE UP OF AN MPO STAFF MEMBER OF PINELLAS COUNTY, PASCO COUNTY, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, THE TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, AND I BELIEVE FDOT, AND THOSE -- THEY REALLY HAD THE FULL INFORMATION MADE BY THE AGENCIES AND SO FORTH OF - - OF THEIR APPLICATIONS AT THE TIME, SO WHILE WE CONCURRED WITH THE MPO STAFF PRESENTATION, THEY REVIEWED IN SUMMARY THE APPLICATION PROCESS AND WHAT THE PROGRAMS AND WHAT THE FUNDS WOULD PAY FOR. WE REALLY DIDN'T HAVE THE -- MAYBE THE COMPLETE PICTURE THAT THAT EVALUATION COMMITTEE WOULD HAVE HAD AND THE COMMENTS, SAY, THAT WERE PRESENTED TODAY FOR YOU. JUST REAL BRIEFLY, THERE WAS AN OFF-THE-AGENDA ITEM ON AN AMENDMENT FOR THE T.I.P., ADVANCING FUNDING FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ON DALE MABRY, THAT THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE THOUGHT WAS A GOOD IDEA, AND WE PASSED A MOTION TO CONCUR WITH THAT. UNDER STATUS REPORTS, PROBABLY THE MOST INTERESTING STATUS REPORT WAS THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF RAIL CORRIDORS THAT THE MPO STAFF AND THEIR CONSULTANT TEAM HAS PREPARED FOR THE NINE TRANSIT CORRIDORS, AND THIS IS ALMOST LIKE A PRE PD&E TYPE OF ANALYSIS THAT WILL HELP SUPPORT SOME OF THE INITIATIVES RIGHT NOW UNDERWAY BY HART AND TBARTA AND SO FORTH ON THE CORRIDORS. THEY'RE SCREENING OUT SOME OF THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND SOME OF THE CHALLENGES OF EACH OF THE CORRIDORS USING THAT EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION DECISION-MAKING TOOL OR ETDM PROCESS. THE NEXT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE WILL BE ON MAY 17th BEGINNING AT 1:30 ON THE 18th FLOOR IN THIS BUILDING, SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, NED. ANY -- ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR NED? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST CURIOUS, MR. CHAIR. >>JOE AFFRONTI: YES, MR. DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NED, WHO SITS ON THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE WITH YOU OR ANY -- >>NED BAIER: WE TYPICALLY HAVE EITHER MANAGERS OR DIRECTORS FROM THE AGENCIES, WHICH WOULD BE THE CITIES, EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY, FDOT, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION, EPC, AND OTHERS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO AT WHAT LEVEL WOULD THEY COME FROM THE DIFFERENT MUNICIPALITIES? >>NED BAIER: TYPICALLY I'D SAY MID-MANAGEMENT, AND WE DO ON OCCASION HAVE DIRECTORS THAT ATTEND FROM THE AGENCIES. THE AVIATION AUTHORITY DIRECTOR USUALLY ATTENDS, THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY PARTICIPATES, AND OTHER AGENCIES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF NOT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, NED. APPRECIATE IT. OKAY. WE HAVE TWO ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE, WE COULD -- WE COULD TAKE BOTH OF THEM AT ONE TIME. WE'LL NEED A ROLL CALL VOTE IF WE TAKE BOTH, OR WE COULD TAKE THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -- TAKE THEM SEPARATELY, SO IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION -- >>ROSE FERLITA: MAKE A MOTION TO ACT ON BOTH OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME. >> SECOND. >>JOE AFFRONTI: MOVED AND SECONDED TO -- OKAY. WE'LL HAVE TO -- ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ANY DISCUSSION? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SO DO WE HAVE -- WE NEED A ROLL CALL VOTE. >> DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >> BECKNER. >>KEVIN BECKNER: YES. >> WHEAT. >>JOHN WHEAT: YES. >> AFFRONTI. >>JOE AFFRONTI: YES. >> COUNCILWOMAN SAUL-SENA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: YES. >> SCOTT. >>THOMAS SCOTT: YES. >> CAETANO. >>JOSEPH CAETANO: YES. >> FERLITA. >>ROSE FERLITA: YES. >> WAINIO. >>RICHARD WAINIO: YES. >> AND WAGGONER. >>JOE WAGGONER: YES. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THE MOTION CARRIES 10-0. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY. WE ACTUALLY HAVE FOUR ACTION ITEMS. WE HAVE ONE THAT WAS PRESENTED BY MR. JOE WAGGONER FROM THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY, AND WE NEED TO TAKE THAT FIRST BECAUSE JOE WILL BE HAVING TO LEAVE EARLIER, SO THERE'S A LETTER THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE US APPROVE TO SEND TO GOVERNOR CRIST TO VETO A RECENTLY PASSED BILL, SO I'LL ASK MR. WAGGONER TO GO AHEAD AND TELL US WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT. >>JOE WAGGONER: THANK YOU, SIR. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THIS BOARD TO WRITE A LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR REQUESTING HIS LINE ITEM VETO OF RECENTLY PASSED LEGISLATION THAT TAKES $19 MILLION FROM THEA INTENDED FOR THE USE IN OUR REGION. WE ARE CONCERNED AS MUCH ABOUT THE $19 MILLION AND IT -- AND GOING AWAY FROM HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND TAMPA NEEDS AS MUCH AS WE ARE ABOUT THE LANGUAGE IN THE BILL. THE LANGUAGE ITSELF SETS SOME WE BELIEVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES IN MOTION. IT REQUIRES THE ADVANCED PAYMENT OF A SUBORDINATED DEBT THAT THE AGENCY HAS INCURRED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND THAT DEBT HAS BEEN ACCRUED UNDER THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEA AND D.O.T. AND THE TERMS OF REPAYMENT OF THAT DEBT ARE LAID OUT IN THAT AGREEMENT AS WELL, AND THE LEGISLATURE HAS BASICALLY TAKEN A SUBORDINATED DEBT, REALLY A SUPER SUBORDINATED DEBT AND MADE IT A CURRENT DEBT. THE CONSEQUENCES OF THAT ARE THAT IT WILL INCREASE OUR -- OUR RISK, OUR CREDIT RISK, WHICH WILL REDUCE OUR CREDIT RATINGS, CAUSING US A HIGHER COST OF MONEY, AND IT SETS A PRECEDENT STATEWIDE FOR ANY OTHER AGENCY WHO'S IN A SIMILAR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR WITH OTHER STATE AGENCIES. IT'S NOT JUST NECESSARILY A TRANSPORTATION RISK. WHEN CREDIT RATING AGENCIES LOOK AT THE STRUCTURE OF AN AGENCY AND THEIR FLOW OF FUNDS AND WHAT COSTS THEY HAVE TO PAY, THESE ARE THINGS THEY CONSIDER, AND THE STATE LEGISLATURE TOOK A LONG-TERM DEBT -- AND I WON'T GET INTO THE TECHNICALITIES OF EXPLAINING WHAT THAT IS, BUT IT IS A VERY SUBORDINATED DEBT, AND THEY SAID INSTEAD OF YOU -- THEY PUT IT BASICALLY EVEN IN FRONT OF OUR DEBT SERVICE COST BY MAKING THIS DEMAND THAT WE MAKE THE $19-MILLION PAYMENT. THERE ARE BETTER WAYS THIS COULD HAVE BEEN DONE AND COULD BE DONE IF -- IF THE LEGISLATURE OR THE GOVERNOR SO DESIRES, BUT THIS PARTICULAR LANGUAGE AND THE $19 MILLION IS, WE BELIEVE, THE WRONG -- THE WRONG THING TO DO AND DONE IN A WRONG WAY, SO I'M ASKING THE BOARD TO WRITE A LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR UNDER THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE ASKING FOR HIS VETO OF THAT PARTICULAR PIECE OF LEGISLATION. >>THOMAS SCOTT: SECOND. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, JOE. COMMENTS. >>THOMAS SCOTT: YEAH. >>JOE AFFRONTI: YES, MR. SCOTT. >>THOMAS SCOTT: I SECOND THAT MOTION, AND JOE HAS OUTLINED THE CRITICAL ISSUES FOR US. I SERVE ON THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY AS WELL, AND HOPEFULLY THAT WE CAN RESOLVE IT THROUGH SOME OTHER MEANS, BUT THIS HERE DOES NOT HELP OUR CREDIT RATING FOR FUTURE BONDING ISSUES AS WELL AS IT ALSO PUT AT RISK ANY OTHER AGENCY IN THE FUTURE TO BE HIJACKED BY THE LEGISLATURE JUST BECAUSE YOU GOT MONEY SITTING IN A RESERVE ACCOUNT, SO THAT DOES NOT SEND A GOOD MESSAGE, SO I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MORE DISCUSSION? MR. DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANKS, JOE AND TOM, FOR THE UPDATE. I HAD READ ABOUT THIS, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT ACTUALLY HAD PASSED. BUT A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. WHAT -- WHAT IS THE REFERENCE -- THE BILL NUMBER IN CASE WE WANT TO SEND OUR OWN E-MAILS? >>JOE WAGGONER: I'LL HAVE TO LOOK THAT UP AND GET IT FOR YOU. I JUST BASICALLY HAVE THE LANGUAGE. THE PORTION THAT CONCERNED ME WAS ALL I PULLED OUT. I CAN GET THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. WELL, OUR LETTER SHOULD DEFINITELY REFERENCE IT -- >>JOE WAGGONER: YES, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: -- AND THEN IF YOU CAN SEND THAT TO US INDIVIDUALLY, MAYBE WE CAN SEND OUR OWN INDIVIDUAL LETTERS AND E-MAILS. >>JOE WAGGONER: THAT WOULD BE APPRECIATED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT IS THE -- POLITICALLY WHAT IS THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE -- OF A VETO? HAVE YOU GOT THE SCHOOLTEACHERS ONBOARD WITH YOU OR -- [LAUGHTER] >>JOE WAGGONER: RIGHT NOW IT'S ABOUT RECRUITING SUPPORT IN THIS EFFORT, SIR, AND TIME WILL TELL. WE HAVE A SHORT WINDOW. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. YEAH, AND THAT WAS ANOTHER POINT THAT -- YOU KNOW, SENDING A LETTER, WELL, WE BETTER GET THEIR ATTENTION ANOTHER WAY. >>JOE WAGGONER: YES, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT'S THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO ON THIS FOR THE AGENCY? DO YOU HAVE THE MONEY IN CASE HE DOESN'T VETO IT AND -- >>JOE WAGGONER: WE DO HAVE THE MONEY. THAT IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. THEY SAW THAT WE STILL HAD $69 MILLION IN CASH IN OUR ACCOUNTS RIGHT NOW. IT WAS NOT A RESERVE. WE HAD A VERY SPECIFIC PLAN OF FINANCE THAT INCORPORATED THAT $69 MILLION. 60 OF IT WAS GOING TO GO TO REPAY SOME -- SOME BONDS THAT WE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE R.E.L. REMEDIATION EFFORTS, AND IF WE DO THAT, WE CAN BASICALLY RESTRUCTURE FINANCING, AND OUR -- OUR DESIRE WAS TO GO AHEAD AND ISSUE NEW BONDS AND POTENTIALLY ADD WIDENING TO A 1.4-MILE SECTION OF OUR ROADWAY THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO UNDERGO TOTAL RECONSTRUCTION IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS, SO WE HAD A VERY SPECIFIC PLAN. IT'S NOT LIKE THE MONEY WAS JUST LAYING THERE AND WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH IT. NOBODY FROM THE LEGISLATURE OTHER THAN OUR MEMBERS AFTER THEY FOUND OUT ABOUT THE LANGUAGE ASKED US ABOUT WHAT ARE YOU DOING WITH THAT MONEY, WHAT ARE YOUR INTENDED USES WITH IT. THEY ACTED -- IT WAS INTRODUCED AS FAR AS WE KNOW IN A VACUUM. THEY HAD NO CONVERSATION WITH US ABOUT OUR PLANS TO USE THOSE FUNDS AND WHAT OUR INTENDED USE WAS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND HOW ABOUT -- I DON'T WANT TO PUT THEM ON THE SPOT OVER THERE, BUT HOW ABOUT THE DEPARTMENT, HAVE THEY BEEN SUPPORTIVE OF YOU ON THIS? >>JOE WAGGONER: THE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARY SKELTON, DISTRICT 7, HAVE BEEN WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH US ON THIS PLAN OF FINANCE AND WHAT WE WANTED TO DO. SECRETARY SKELTON IS ANOTHER MEMBER OF MY BOARD, SO HE'S BEEN VERY AWARE OF OUR INTENTIONS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER -- YES, MS. SAUL-SENA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: ON THIS BOARD WE REPRESENT A NUMBER OF MUNICIPALITIES IN THE COUNTY, AND EACH OF US IN OUR BOARD MEETINGS LATER THIS WEEK CAN TAKE SIMILAR ACTION TO SUPPORT WHAT YOU'RE DOING. I THINK YOU'RE CORRECT THAT WE NEED TO DO THIS IMMEDIATELY AND IT NEEDS TO COME FROM AS MANY VOICES AS POSSIBLE, AND - - AND I -- I HOPE THAT THIS IS SUCCESSFUL. I THINK WE WERE ALL SHOCKED WHEN WE OPENED THE NEWSPAPER AND READ ABOUT THIS PROPOSED RAID ON THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY WHICH UNDERMINES NOT ONLY THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY BUT ANY PUBLICLY FINANCED ENTITY. IT WAS -- THIS LEGISLATIVE SESSION WAS REALLY NOT VERY PROFESSIONAL. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER -- ANY OTHER COMMENTS? >>JOE WAGGONER: I WILL ADD ONE OTHER THING TO IT -- >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. >>JOE WAGGONER: -- TALKING ABOUT THE SESSION IN GENERAL. I -- EITHER IN THE LETTER OR AS A SEPARATE LETTER, THE BOARD MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER ADDRESSING THE $160-MILLION SWEEP FROM THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND. I DON'T KNOW, AND I DOUBT THAT SECRETARY SKELTON KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT THE AFFECT OF THAT IS GOING TO BE ON THE CAPITAL PROGRAM, BUT IT WILL NOT BE INSIGNIFICANT. OUR PIECE OF LANGUAGE WE ANY IS NOT AS ENCUMBERED IN TERMS OF HOW IT'S WOVEN INTO THE BUDGET, SO OURS MIGHT BE EASIER FOR THE GOVERNOR TO LINE ITEM VETO. THE SWEEP MIGHT BE MUCH MORE DIFFICULT. NEVERTHELESS, A STATEMENT OF CONCERN OR CONTRARY TO THE ACTIONS THEY TOOK COULD BE APPROPRIATE, BUT I'D JUST PUT THAT ON THE TABLE FOR THE BOARD TO CONSIDER AS WELL. >>JOE AFFRONTI: I THOUGHT WE SENT A LETTER REGARDING THAT ISSUE. >>JOE WAGGONER: WE DID, AND WHILE THE SWEEP WAS REDUCED -- SECRETARY SKELTON IS PROBABLY THE BEST ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS -- THEY STILL SWEPT $160 MILLION, I BELIEVE, FROM THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND. >>DON SKELTON: YES. THE CURRENT BUDGET HAS THE CURRENT LANGUAGE MR. WAGGONER IS TALKING ABOUT, SWEEPING $160 MILLION FROM THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND PENDING FEDERAL ACTION ON THE MEDICAID BILLS. IF CONGRESS PASSES PART OF THE MEDICAID AND THAT MONEY COMES TO FLORIDA, THEN $40 MILLION WILL BE RETURNED TO THE STATE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND, SO IT COULD BE ANYWHERE FROM $120- TO $160 MILLION, AND THEN DEPENDING ON, YOU KNOW, WHETHER THE $19 MILLION STAYS IN THE IMPLEMENTING -- BECAUSE I THINK THAT LANGUAGE IS IN THE IMPLEMENTING BILL - - >>JOE WAGGONER: CORRECT. >>DON SKELTON: -- WHICH WILL AFFECT A LOT OF OTHER AGENCIES, SO, YOU KNOW, WHETHER THE GOVERNOR IS GOING TO VETO THAT OR NOT, WE'LL WAIT AND SEE, BUT IF THAT 19 MILLION COMES OFF OF THAT, THEN THERE WOULD BE $100 MILLION, BUT EVEN AT $100 MILLION, THAT WOULD IMPACT OUR FIVE-YEAR WORK PROGRAM TO ABOUT THE TUNE -- $100 MILLION WOULD PROBABLY HAVE ABOUT A $375-MILLION IMPACT ON PROJECTS THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO BE LOOKING AT. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. SHOULD WE CONSIDER THAT SENDING ONE LETTER OR TWO SEPARATE LETTERS? >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: TWO. >> I'D SEND TWO SEPARATE LETTERS. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: TWO. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS BEFORE WE TAKE ACTION? >>RICHARD WAINIO: ONE QUESTION. >>JOE AFFRONTI: YES. >>RICHARD WAINIO: SIMILAR TO WHAT THEY DID WITH THE SWEEP WHERE THEY STARTED WITH A BIG NUMBER AND REDUCED IT, THEY DID THE SAME THING FOR YOU, I BELIEVE, THEY STARTED WITH A MUCH LARGER NUMBER AND DROPPED IT TO THE 19 MILLION. I KNOW WHEN IT FIRST POPPED OUT OF THAT BACK ROOM, REPRESENTATIVE GLORIOSO AND OTHER LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES WERE APPALLED, APPARENTLY, AND WERE PRETTY FORCEFUL ON IT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT ONCE THEY COMPROMISED OR ARRANGED A LOWER NUMBER THAT WE STILL HAVE OUR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES, REPRESENTATIVE GLORIOSO AND OTHERS, STILL OPPOSING THAT AND -- OR DID THEY GET ONBOARD WITH IT? >>JOE WAGGONER: I BELIEVE -- WHILE IT'S HARD TO BE HAPPY ABOUT SOMEONE TAKING $19 MILLION FROM YOUR AGENCY THAT YOU HAD A SPECIFIC PLAN OF USE FOR, I WAS VERY HAPPY, AND I OWE THAT -- WE OWE AS AN AGENCY A GREAT DEAL OF THANKS TO OUR LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION. THEY REALLY -- WHEN THEY SAW THIS, THEY REACTED IMMEDIATELY, THEY REACTED STRONGLY. REPRESENTATIVE GLORIOSO DESERVES A GREAT DEAL OF THANKS FOR A LOT OF HARD WORK TO REACH WHAT WAS A COMPROMISE THAT GREATLY REDUCED THE POTENTIAL IMPACT. REPRESENTATIVE WEATHERFORD WAS VERY HELPFUL AS WELL, SO WE'RE VERY GRATEFUL, AND I THANK RICHARD FOR REMINDING ME AND GIVING ME AN OPPORTUNITY TO STATE. THIS I WAS ALL ABOUT JUST GETTING THIS LETTER DONE TODAY, BUT THIS AGENCY AND I THINK THIS COUNTY SHOULD RECOGNIZE THAT OUR DELEGATION HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THIS LANGUAGE BEING INTRODUCED, AND WHEN THEY FOUND OUT, THEY REACTED SWIFTLY AND THEY WERE, AS FAR AS I COULD TELL, IN UNANIMOUS SUPPORT OF TRYING TO MAKE A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE, AND THEY WERE SUCCESSFUL IN DOING THAT, AND THIS AGENCY IS VERY GRATEFUL FOR THAT ACTION. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ADAM, DO WE NEED -- WE ALREADY HAVE A MOTION FOR THE LETTER FROM THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY -- FOR THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY. >>ADAM GORMLY: CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT. >>JOE AFFRONTI: SO WE NEED ANOTHER MOTION FOR THE OTHER -- >>ADAM GORMLY: I WOULD SUGGEST YOU VOTE ON THIS MOTION THAT'S ON THE FLOOR AND MAKE A SEPARATE MOTION TO ADDRESS THE TRANSPORTATION DOCUMENT. >>THOMAS SCOTT: WHY DON'T YOU JUST AMEND THE MOTION THAT WE SEND TWO LETTERS, CAN YOU DO THAT IN JUST ONE VOTE? >>ADAM GORMLY: YEAH, THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE IF THERE'S SUFFICIENT UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND LETTER SHOULD -- >>THOMAS SCOTT: I'LL SECOND HIS MOTION. [INAUDIBLE] >>JOE AFFRONTI: YOU WANT TO AMEND THAT? >>JOE WAGGONER: I CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT. I'D REQUEST THE BOARD TO SEND A LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR FOR A LINE ITEM VETO OF THE LANGUAGE TAKING $19 MILLION AWAY FROM THE TAMPA-HILLSBOROUGH EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY. ALSO REQUEST THE BOARD TO SEND A SEPARATE LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR REQUESTING HIS CONSIDERATION OF VETO OF THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND SWEEP. >>THOMAS SCOTT: SECOND. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES] OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. SO WE'LL ASK MR. CHIARAMONTE TO DRAFT A LETTER AND SEND IT TO ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS, AND IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH IT, PLEASE GET BACK TO HIM. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS AN ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF HILLSBOROUGH MPO, BETH ALDEN. >>BETH ALDEN: GOOD MORNING, BOARD MEMBERS. BETH ALDEN, MPO STAFF, AND I HAVE A BRIEF REPORT FOR YOU ON THE ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF THE MPO. AS YOU KNOW, THE MPO RECEIVES FEDERAL FUNDS FOR METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND MUST CONDUCT THAT PLANNING IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. OUR PLANNING ACTIVITIES ARE CERTIFIED EVERY FOUR YEARS IN A MAJOR REVIEW BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION. IN BETWEEN THOSE MAJOR REVIEWS THERE IS AN ANNUAL CERTIFICATION CONDUCTED JOINTLY WITH THE MPO AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. OUR REVIEW HAS BEEN DRAFTED THIS YEAR, AND THE D.O.T., AFTER REVIEWING OUR RESPONSES TO THREE TO FIVE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW WE COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS, HAS IDENTIFIED SOME BEST PRACTICES AND SOME OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS. BEST PRACTICES NOTED HAVE TO DO WITH OUR PUBLIC OUTREACH EFFORTS, THE MPO'S PROACTIVE EFFORTS TO DEVELOP ALTERNATIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION, ALSO IN REPORTING IN OUR MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS OUR PROGRESS TOWARDS DELIVERABLES THAT ARE FUNDED BY THE GRANTS, AND FINALLY IN SUPPORTING CORRIDOR STUDIES, INCLUDING HART'S LIGHT RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY. OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS INCLUDE TAKING A NEW LOOK AT OUR CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS. WE WILL BE MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS, AND YOU'LL BEGIN TO SEE SOME MAJOR ACTIVITIES HAVING TO DO WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS UPDATE. ALSO REPORTING ON OUR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEASURABLES, AND I WILL BRING A STATUS REPORT TO YOU ON THAT NEXT MONTH. SO AT THIS TIME THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN THE JOINT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT SO THAT THAT CAN BE TRANSMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: THANK YOU, BETH. MAYOR AFFRONTI IS COMING BACK RIGHT NOW, SO WE CAN ... >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: SHOULD WE ANNOUNCE THAT? >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: YEAH. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. I APOLOGIZE. WE HAVE TWO MORE ACTION ITEMS OR ACTUALLY THREE MORE, AND WE WOULD NOT HAVE HAD A QUORUM IF JOE LEFT, SO THANK YOU, JOE, FOR COMING BACK. OKAY. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: JUST TO MAKE THE BOARD AWARE OF WHAT THE ISSUE IS, I GUESS THE MAYOR IS ANNOUNCING A NEW FIRE CHIEF, AND THE COUNCIL MEMBERS -- SOME OF THEM HAD TO LEAVE FOR THAT. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: SOME. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER -- ANY COMMENTS OR -- >>MARK SHARPE: MOVE APPROVAL. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OH, WAIT. WE NEED JOE TO COME BACK AND -- AND MS. FERLITA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: SHE'S RIGHT HERE. ROSE, WE NEED YOU TO COME BECAUSE WE NEED TO VOTE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. DISCUSSION? ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES] OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, BETH. >>BETH ALDEN: THANKS SO MUCH. >>JOE AFFRONTI: SORRY FOR THE MIX-UP. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: SORRY. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS THE DRAFT UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM, RANDY KRANJEC. >>RANDY KRANJEC: GOOD MORNING. RANDY KRANJEC, MPO STAFF. I'M GOING TO PRESENT TO YOU THE DRAFT UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FOR THE NEXT TWO FISCAL YEARS, '10-'11 AND '11-'12. AS YOU KNOW, THESE ARE -- THESE PLANNING FUNCTIONS ARE SUPPORTED BY FEDERAL GRANTS PRIMARILY, AND THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM IS BASICALLY THE BLUEPRINT OR THE OUTLINE OF WORK FOR THE NEXT TWO FISCAL YEARS FOR THE MPO, HART, THE D.O.T. DISTRICT 7, ALONG WITH THE FLORIDA COMMISSION FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED. THE CURRENT DOCUMENT WILL EXPIRE ON JUNE 30th, AND WITH YOUR APPROVAL, THIS ONE WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON JULY 31st -- JULY 1st. HERE'S OUR ANTICIPATED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 AND THEN FISCAL YEAR 2012 WITH THE BREAKDOWN IN FEDERAL FUNDING. WE HAVE, AS YOU'LL SEE THERE, SOME MORE MONEY IN '11, A LITTLE IMBALANCE, BECAUSE OF THE DEOBLIGATION MONEY THAT YOU ADDRESSED LAST MONTH AND ROLLED FORWARD $500,000 INTO NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET. SOME OF OUR MAIN TASKS. IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS ON THOSE, I'LL BE CERTAINLY HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. THESE ARE THINGS YOU SEE ON A REGULAR BASIS. HERE IS OUR '10-'11 FUNDING BY TASK, A BREAKDOWN ON HOW THE MONEY WILL BE -- HOW IT'LL BE SPENT AND WHAT TYPES OF PROJECTS, THE FDOT MONEY, THE HART MONEY, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. SAME THING FOR '11 AND '12. ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS FOR THIS UPWP IS AN ADOPTING RESOLUTION IN THE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO PURSUE AND APPLY FOR NEW GRANTS WHICH CAN HASTEN AND ALLOW US A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBILITY IN REACTING TO SOME GRANT APPLICATIONS AND PURSUING THEM. AGAIN, THERE IS A LARGE ONE THAT WE WILL MOST LIKELY APPLY FOR, I BELIEVE, RAY, THE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE GRANT UPCOMING, A VERY LARGE GRANT THAT THE MPO WILL PARTNER WITH SOME OTHER AGENCIES LOCALLY. SOME OF THE AGENCY COMMENTS THAT WE RECEIVED AS WE WENT THROUGH THE PRESENTATIONS. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, MR. BAIER MENTIONED EARLIER, WE ARE GOING TO ASSIST THE COUNTY THIS YEAR WITH TRAFFIC COUNT DATA COLLECTION. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO WORK WITH THE CITY AS WELL AND -- AND INCORPORATE SOME CITY LOCATIONS INTO THAT WORK AS WELL TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GETTING THE MOST IMPORTANT LOCATIONS AND SPOTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND COUNTY. WE WILL BE KICKING OFF A WATER TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY HERE VERY QUICKLY WITH THE COUNTY STAFF. WE HAVE -- WE'RE ANTICIPATING APPROVAL OF THAT BY FHWA AND FDOT WITHIN THE NEXT DAY OR TWO. SOME ADDITIONAL COMMENTS THAT YOU SEE THERE WERE THE WESTSHORE ALLIANCE HAS ASKED FOR SOME ASSISTANCE WITH THE MOBILITY PLAN, THE DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PEDESTRIAN PLAN, AND AS YOU'LL SEE SHORTLY, WE ARE GOING TO DO A BIKE AND PED PLAN IN THE CITY OF TAMPA THAT WE CAN INCORPORATE, THEN, THE DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP'S REQUEST INTO THAT WORK. WE'LL CONTINUE TO ASSIST HART WITH THEIR WORK ON NEW STARTS AND STATION AREA PLANNING. THERE YOU SEE ON THE TOP RIGHT A COMPLETE STREETS INITIATIVE THAT WE'LL WORK WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA ON, THE TAMPA PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLING PLAN. AIR QUALITY AGAIN WILL BECOME AN ISSUE, AND I THINK YOU'LL HEAR A BRIEF REPORT ON THAT FURTHER ON DOWN THE AGENDA. SOME OF OUR OTHER HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE NEXT TWO FISCAL YEARS. AND SO WE TOOK THIS BEFORE ALL THE COMMITTEES, THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE, THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, THE LIVABLE ROADWAYS COMMITTEE, AND AS YOU HEARD PREVIOUSLY, BOTH THE TAC ON APRIL 19th AND THE CAC ON APRIL 14th RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND FORWARDING IT ON TO THE MPO BOARD FOR YOUR APPROVAL AS WELL. THERE ARE AGENCY COMMENTS IN THE BACK OF THE DOCUMENT FROM FHWA AND FDOT, ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, AND WE'VE ALREADY GOTTEN A RESPONSE BACK FROM FHWA THAT OUR COMMENTS WERE -- WERE GOOD AND THEY APPRECIATED THEM, AND WE APPRECIATED THEIR COMMENTS, SO WITH THAT, WE ASK THAT YOU WOULD APPROVE THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS '10-'11 AND 2011-2012. >>JOE AFFRONTI: ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR MR. KRANJEC? YES, MS. SAUL-SENA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THANK YOU. NOT A COMMENT, JUST IT'S VERY COMPLETE. I'M SPECIFICALLY PLEASED TO SEE THAT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY WAS SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THIS. WE'LL REFER TO IT LATER IN OUR -- IN OUR COMMITTEE REPORT, BUT IT'S REALLY KEY. WE'RE MAKING ALL THESE WONDERFUL INVESTMENTS IN SYSTEMS, BUT IF WE DON'T EDUCATE THE PUBLIC SO THAT PEOPLE ARE SAFE WALKING OR BICYCLING, OUR INVESTMENTS ARE IN VAIN, SO IT NEEDS TO ALL WORK TOGETHER, BUT YOU-ALL SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED THIS IN THE UPWP, WHICH IS GREAT. THANKS. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? OKAY. WE NEED A MOTION. >>ROSE FERLITA: SO MOVE. >> [INAUDIBLE] >>JOE AFFRONTI: MOVED -- MOVED AND SECONDED. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES] OKAY. OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, SIR. OKAY. WE HAVE JOBS ACCESS AND NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM PRIORITIES, MICHELE OGILVIE. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: THANK YOU. MICHELE OGILVIE, MPO STAFF. BEFORE YOU THIS MORNING IS THE -- ARE THE RECOMMENDED RANKINGS FOR FUNDING OF PROGRAMS FOR THE JOB ACCESS REVERSE COMMUTE FUNDING CYCLE AS WELL AS NEW FREEDOM. THIS COMES OUT OF YOUR ACTIONS IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR WITH THE TRICOUNTY ACCESS PLAN, WHICH IS PART OF THE SAFETEA-LU LEGISLATION. THE TRICOUNTY ACCESS PLAN IS ALSO KNOWN IN THAT LEGISLATION AS THE LOCALLY COORDINATED HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AND WITH IT COMES FUNDING FOR THESE TWO PROGRAMS. THE PLAN WAS DEVELOPED THROUGH A PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS, A TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ANALYSIS, AND A PRIORITIZATION THAT IS THEN USED. THE PLAN GOALS ARE TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO EMPLOYMENT FOR LOW-INCOME INDIVIDUALS, TO IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO INCREASE INTEGRATION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN THE WORKFORCE AND TO FULLY PARTICIPATE IN SOCIETY, TO REMOVE DUPLICATIONS OF SERVICES AND TO MAXIMIZE FUNDING. ALSO IN THIS PLAN OUR GOAL IS TO INCREASE SAFETY THROUGH PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES, TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSONS, AND ALSO TO INCREASE HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT OPTIONS BY ENSURING THAT THERE IS TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIVITY. FIVE PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THAT PLAN, FIRST ONE BEING LIMITED EVENING AND WEEKEND SERVICE FOR BUSES, A LACK OF EDUCATION ON AVAILABLE SERVICES, VERY LITTLE INTERCOUNTY TRAVEL OPPORTUNITIES. THERE WAS A NEED FOR MORE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN GENERAL, INCLUDING THE LONGER SPAN OF SERVICES, MORE ROUTES -- IN HERE IT'S LOOPING BACK TO THE FIRST NEED OR ISSUE -- AND NOT ENOUGH PARATRANSIT SERVICE FOR SHOPPING, RECREATION, AND EMPLOYMENT TRIPS. IN IMPLEMENTING THIS PLAN, IN DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS WAS ISSUED BY PINELLAS COUNTY, HILLSBOROUGH, AND PASCO CALLING FOR SERVICES AND PROPOSALS THAT WOULD FULFILL THIS PLAN. IN MARCH, VERY EARLY, I THINK IT WAS MARCH 4th OF 2010, STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATIONS THAT CAME IN. THERE WERE FOUR FOR JOB ACCESS AND EIGHT FOR NEW FREEDOM. STAFF REVIEWERS INCLUDED THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STAFF, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MPO STAFF, PASCO COUNTY, PINELLAS COUNTY MPOs, AND THE TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF MEMBER. THE CRITERIA ON WHICH THE REVIEW FOR THESE 12 APPLICATIONS WAS DONE IS, FIRST OF ALL, DID IT COINCIDE WITH A PLAN STRATEGY, DID IT FULFILL A STRATEGY, DID IT DEFINE AN OPERATIONAL PLAN THAT WAS TRULY SUPPORTED THROUGH ITS FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES, WAS IT COST-EFFECTIVE, DID IT PLAN FOR MEASURABLE EFFECTIVENESS, DID IT HAVE A BACKUP PLAN THAT COULD HELP IT IF, SAY, WE WERE COMPLETE IN THIS WAY BUT WE MESSED UP IN THIS WAY, ARE WE TRULY READY TO RECEIVE THE FUNDING REQUESTED? IN DOING THIS ANALYSIS, THE JOB HOUSING ACCESS PROJECTS THAT WERE AWARDED OR RECOMMENDED, EXCUSE ME, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ARE HART TO DEAL WITH THE LATE NIGHT AND WEEKEND SERVICES ON ROUTES THAT ARE OUTLINED IN YOUR REPORT AND FOR THE SUNSHINE LINE TO CONTINUE TO EXPAND ITS SERVICES FOR EMPLOYMENT AND WORK-RELATED ACTIVITIES SUCH AS JOB TRAINING AND INTERVIEWS. AND NOW FOR THE BIG ONE. THE NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, THERE WERE THREE THAT WERE AWARDED. THE TWO WERE IMMEDIATELY DISMISSED FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO MEET THE STANDARDS, AND STAFF DID PUT THOSE OUT, SO THERE WERE EIGHT, BUT NOW THERE ARE SIX THAT WERE RANKED. THE TRAVEL TRAINER FOR HART IN BILINGUAL LANGUAGES WAS THE HART PROPOSAL, AND THAT WAS RANKED FOURTH, AND THE FIFTH RANKING WAS TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 25 ADA-COMPLIANT LANDING PADS AND SHELTERS AT BUS STOPS WHICH WOULD FULFILL EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND ALLOW FOR MUCH MORE TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIONS FOR THOSE WHO MAY HAVE DISABILITIES OR WHO MAY HAVE OTHER ISSUES. WE BELIEVE THAT THIS ONE DID RANK FIFTH. AND THEN THE QUALITY OF LIFE, WHICH YOU HAVE HEARD OF, WAS RANKED SIXTH. THE FUNDING LEVELS ARE 1.5 MILLION FOR EACH, AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WAS THAT THE -- ALL PROJECTS IN JARC SHOULD BE AWARDED. IT IS AN ESTIMATE, WE ARE NOT SURE EXACTLY HOW MUCH MONEY IS ACTUALLY GOING TO COME FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AT THIS TIME, AND I BELIEVE IN THE NEXT WEEK OR SO THE PROGRAM MANAGER, WHO IS PINELLAS COUNTY, WILL HAVE THAT ANSWER FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NEW FREEDOM ALSO ABOUT $1.5 MILLION, AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE FIVE -- THAT THE PROJECT MANAGER MOVE FORWARD IN NEGOTIATING WITH THE TOP FIVE RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING. THE MPO COMMITTEES HEARD THIS RECOMMENDATION. AS YOU'VE HEARD ALREADY FROM THE CAC AND TAC, THEY DID ENDORSE THIS. THEY DID NOT HAVE THE BENEFIT OF QUALITY OF LIFE REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION TO THE -- TO THESE COMMITTEES, BUT THE TD BOARD DID, AND THEY WERE ACTUALLY THE LAST BOARD TO HEAR THE -- THIS RECOMMENDATION AND PROJECTS. THEIR RECOMMENDATION WAS TO ENDORSE ALL THE JARC RANKINGS, AND THEY DID ASK -- AND I WILL READ, IF MR. CHAIRMAN WILL ALLOW ME TO STEAL HIS THUNDER FOR THE CHAIRMAN'S REPORT, EXACTLY WHAT THE TD BOARD DID ASK THE MPOs TO CONSIDER THIS MORNING. THEIR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THEY REQUEST THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE REEXAMINE THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS AWARDED AND CONSIDER A SMALLER OR PILOT PROJECT FOR THE SIXTH-RANKED PROJECT, WHICH WILL INCLUDE PROVIDING ACTUALLY INCREASED OR NEW TRIPS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. I'D LIKE TO SAY THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT YOU DO SUPPORT THE RANKINGS. OUT OF SIX THREE ARE COMING TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. IT IS CERTAINLY UP TO THE BOARD TO MAKE THAT DECISION. THEY DO HAVE -- YOU DO HAVE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TD BOARD IN WHICH TO MAKE THAT -- YOU CAN EMBRACE THAT. I HAVE SPOKEN TO PINELLAS COUNTY'S ADMINISTRATOR. THEY ARE AWARE OF WHAT THE TD BOARD IS RECOMMENDING AND IS WILLING TO HEAR AND TO CERTAINLY FIND WAYS TO HELP THE QUALITY OF LIFE APPLICATION GET SOME FUNDING. THE FIRST FUND -- I'M TOLD THAT THE FIRST FUNDING -- THE NUMBER ONE IN THE NEW FREEDOM OUT OF PASCO COUNTY BEGAN AS A PILOT PROJECT, SO THERE IS OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE CONSIDERATION OF THE HILLSBOROUGH MPO'S MOTION, WHICHEVER YOU -- WHICHEVER WAY YOU WISH TO GO ON THIS PROJECT. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, MICHELE. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR MICHELE? YES. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THANK YOU. IN REVIEWING THIS, IT'S NOT TREMENDOUSLY CLEAR TO ME WHICH OF THESE PROGRAMS IS IN HILLSBOROUGH AND WHICH ONES ARE IN OTHER COMMUNITIES. THE NUMBER ONE, BAY CARE BEHAVIORAL -- >>MICHELE OGILVIE: BAY CARE IS IN PASCO COUNTY. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: OKAY. WHEN WE GET THESE IN THE FUTURE, COULD THERE BE AN INDICATION OF WHERE THE REQUESTS ARE FROM, BECAUSE HONESTLY, IT SOUNDS TREMENDOUSLY REDUNDANT, BUT IF YOU REALIZE THAT THEY'RE SERVING DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES, THEN IT MAKES SENSE, WHY THERE'S THREE THINGS THAT -- THREE DIFFERENT PROGRAMS THAT ARE DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THING. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: YES, MA'AM. CERTAINLY. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? IF NOT, WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE -- >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: OR COULD WE MODIFY IT? >>JOE AFFRONTI: YEAH, WELL, IF YOU WANT TO MODIFY IT, MAKE A MOTION TO MODIFY IT. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THE ISSUES BROUGHT UP EARLIER INDICATE THAT IN ADDITION TO SPENDING MONEY ON HARDWARE AND TRAINING THAT WE SHOULD ALSO SPEND MONEY ON ADDITIONAL TRIPS, AND SO THAT'S THE CONSIDERATION. I'D REALLY LIKE -- SINCE I'M NEWLY BACK ON THE MPO, I'D RATHER HEAR FROM MY COLLEAGUES AS TO YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS. >>JOE AFFRONTI: YES, ROSE. >>ROSE FERLITA: JUST SIMPLY BACK AND REFERRING TO MS. CASTELLANO'S COMMENTS AND MR. AMON'S COMMENTS AS WELL, I'M NOT SURE AT THE TIME THAT HER GROUP REPRESENTED OR DID NOT REPRESENT FULLY, WAS THAT THE OPPORTUNITY TO -- TO BID FOR -- FOR CONSIDERATION OR -- OR -- I MEAN -- WHAT SHE SAID AND I THINK WHERE MR. BECKNER WAS GOING IS SIMILAR TO A BID PROTEST. I MEAN -- >>MICHELE OGILVIE: YES. >>ROSE FERLITA: -- WAS THAT THE OPPORTUNITY THAT WAS AFFORDED TO THEM WHERE THEY COULD HAVE EXPANDED ON WHAT THEIR SERVICES WOULD BE AND WHAT THEY BROUGHT TO THE TABLE FOR CONSIDERATION? IT SEEMS LIKE SOME OF THAT IS MISSING, AND I DON'T KNOW IF MS. CASTELLANO REPRESENTED THAT GROUP OR SOMEONE ELSE. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROCESS WAS FAIR AND THAT THEY WERE AFFORDED, IN FACT, THE OPPORTUNITY TO SAY WHAT THEY COULD DO SO -- SO THAT THAT COMMITTEE COULD HAVE ALL THE FACTS BEFORE THEM BEFORE THEY AWARDED THE RANKING. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: THE -- THE COMMITTEE BEING THE CAC OR THE -- THE STAFF? >>ROSE FERLITA: WELL, HE BROUGHT IT UP FOR CAC, BUT I GUESS WE COULD EXPAND THAT QUESTION TO BOTH. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: AS I UNDERSTAND IT, WE WERE NEUTRAL, THE STAFF. WE HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION. CERTAINLY THE -- ALL THE -- THE APPLICANTS SHOULD HAVE THE SAME OPPORTUNITY. MS. CASTELLANO, AS A MEMBER OF THE TD BOARD, HAS -- CERTAINLY HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THE TD BOARD AND DID SO. MR. PLOTKIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE CAC. HE WAS ALSO PART OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE APPLICATION AND COULD HAVE SPOKEN TO THE CAC AT THAT TIME BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: WHY NOT? >>MICHELE OGILVIE: HE WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE MEETING. HE WAS NOT -- >>ROSE FERLITA: LINDA, CAN I WEIGH IN ONE MORE QUESTION, AND THEN YOU CAN TAKE OVER IF YOU'D LIKE. ALL I THINK -- AND I DON'T WANT THIS TO BE A DEBATE BACK AND FORTH, BUT I DO WANT TO ASK MS. CASTELLANO A QUESTION IF YOU'LL COME FORWARD. WAS THE ISSUE THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION ON THE DESCRIPTION OF HOW THESE DOLLARS SHOULD BE SPENT? >> CAN I JUST CLARIFY ONE THING ABOUT -- >>JOE AFFRONTI: WOULD YOU PULL THAT MICROPHONE CLOSER? >>ROSE FERLITA: I DIDN'T MEAN FOR YOU TO SIT DOWN. I'M SORRY. >> CAN I CLARIFY SOMETHING ABOUT THE TWO MISSED ADVISORY COMMITTEES? WE HAD GONE TO THE PINELLAS MPO, AND THERE WAS NO ROAD MAP SAYING EXACTLY WHAT DIRECTION ALL THESE -- THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE GOING TO GO IN, SO WHEN WE WENT TO THE PINELLAS MPO, SHE WASN'T REALLY SURE EITHER, I DON'T -- I'M NOT REAL SURE HOW YOU'RE GOING TO DO IT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. SO REALLY WE WERE NEW OUT OF THE BOX AND STRUGGLED WITH REALLY TRYING TO DECIDE WHAT DIRECTION WE SHOULD GO IN, AND WE LITERALLY MISSED THOSE MEETINGS. THERE WAS NOTHING -- AGAIN, THERE WAS NO ROAD MAP THAT SAID THIS IS WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO, THAT'S WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO, OR AT LEAST WE DIDN'T FIND ONE, SO WE WERE NOT PRESENT AT THOSE MEETINGS FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN WE JUST DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THEM TO BE THERE, AND ONCE -- WHEN WE FINALLY FIGURED OUT WHAT WAS GOING ON OR -- AGAIN, NO APOLOGIES I SHOULDN'T BE MAKING, BUT THEN WE STARTED FOLLOWING THE ROUTE, AND THAT'S WHY WE WENT TO THE TD BOARD MEETING AND NOW THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER -- >>ROSE FERLITA: LET'S JUST SEE WHAT HER ANSWER IS, JOE. GO AHEAD. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: MS. FERLITA, THIS IS THE BOARD THAT MAKES THE FORMAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE MPO IN PINELLAS COUNTY. CERTAINLY THE OPPORTUNITY HAS BEEN AVAILED TO THE APPLICANT, AND SHE'S TAKING FULL ADVANTAGE OF THAT OPPORTUNITY, AND SO YOU DO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY NOW TO MAKE THE DECISION HAVING HAD -- >>ROSE FERLITA: WELL, AND I APPRECIATE THAT, BUT CERTAINLY WE DON'T -- WHEN WE DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT, TO OVERRIDE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, WE DON'T DO IT LIGHTLY, SO JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS COME IN HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITY OR WHETHER THEY WERE AWARE OR NOT AWARE, I HAVE TO SAY THAT OTHER APPLICANTS WERE THERE, AND -- >>MICHELE OGILVIE: NO. >>ROSE FERLITA: NO ONE WAS THERE MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS? >>MICHELE OGILVIE: NO, MA'AM. >>ROSE FERLITA: SO YOU-ALL JUST USED WHATEVER INFORMATION YOU HAD TO DETERMINE YOUR -- >>MICHELE OGILVIE: THAT'S CORRECT. >>ROSE FERLITA: -- YOUR PROCESS. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: CAN I ASK A CLARIFYING QUESTION? >>ROSE FERLITA: YEAH, GO AHEAD. >>JOE AFFRONTI: MR. CHIARAMONTE. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: MICHELE, THE TD BOARD'S AND THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ARE THE SAME OR IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT THE TD BOARD RECOMMENDED? >>MICHELE OGILVIE: THE TD BOARD WOULD LIKE THE MPO BOARD TO CONSIDER ACCEPTING A RECOMMENDATION TO PINELLAS COUNTY THAT THEY FIND A WAY TO FUND THE QUALITY OF LIFE APPLICATION. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: OKAY. SO IT WOULD SIMPLY BE A RECOMMENDATION FROM THIS BOARD TO PINELLAS COUNTY TO CONSIDER -- >>MICHELE OGILVIE: YES. THEY WANT TO HEAR THAT. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE A PROBLEM. >>ROSE FERLITA: NO. WELL, THEN, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE REQUESTING -- >>MICHELE OGILVIE: YES, MA'AM. >>ROSE FERLITA: -- I DON'T HAVE ANY -- I THINK ANYTHING PINELLAS CAN KICK IN IN TERMS OF PRICE IS OKAY WITH ME. YEAH, I'LL BE HAPPY TO SUPPORT THAT. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'LL MAKE THE MOTION. >>ROSE FERLITA: I'LL MAKE THAT -- OR I'LL SECOND IT. FINE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. MOVED AND SECONDED. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES] OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MICHELE. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: THANK YOU, SIR. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE STATUS REPORTS THAT WE HAVE -- >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: [INAUDIBLE] >>JOE AFFRONTI: YOU WANT TO MOVE THIS BACK UP? >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: YEAH. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY REFERENDUM, LUCIA GARSYS -- GARSYS. >>LUCIA GARSYS: GOOD MORNING, BOARD MEMBERS. I'M LUCIA GARSYS, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR PLANNING AND INFRASTRUCTURE. WE APPRECIATE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO UPDATE YOU WHERE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ARE ON THE REFERENDUM, AND AS PART OF YOUR PACKAGE, YOU HAVE THREE KEY INGREDIENTS THAT WILL BE THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION ON MAY THE 13th. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HAS SCHEDULED A PUBLIC HEARING MAY 13th IN THE EVENING AT 6:00 P.M. AT ALL PEOPLES LIFE CENTER. THERE WILL BE A PUBLIC HEARING TO HEAR THE ORDINANCE WHICH WILL ACTUALLY BE THE PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT HAS THE BALLOT LANGUAGE THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE REFERENDUM, SO THE BOARD WILL BE HEARING THAT ON MAY 13th. AS WELL, ON MAY 13th THE BOARD WILL HEAR AND RECEIVE INTERLOCAL -- AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THAT IS BEING CIRCULATED BY -- CIRCULATED TO ALL OF THE JURISDICTIONS, SO THAT INCLUDES PLANT CITY, TEMPLE TERRACE, AND THE CITY OF TAMPA FOR SIGNATURE AND EXECUTION AS WELL AS HART. ALL OF THOSE FOUR ENTITIES ARE SIGNING IT NOW. IT WILL BE DELIVERED TO THE BOARD FOR EXECUTION ON MAY -- ON MAY 13th AS WELL. THAT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS THE INSTRUMENT WHEREBY THE RELATIONSHIPS ARE DISCUSSED AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FUNDS, THE 25% AND THE 75% IN THE PROCESS THAT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED IN MOVING THE PROJECTS ALONG. IN THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THERE'S REFERENCE TO TWO ITEMS. ONE IS CALLED THE TRANSIT PLAN -- IT HAS A LONGER NAME -- AND ANOTHER ONE IS THE ROAD PLAN. AS PART OF YOUR PACKAGE, ALSO YOU HAVE THE ROAD PLAN THAT ALSO IDENTIFIES THE TEN-YEAR PROJECTS, WHICH PROJECTS WOULD BE UNDERTAKEN IN THE FIRST TEN-YEAR PERIOD BASED ON THE CASH FLOW AND THE REVENUE PROJECTIONS, THE REVENUE DISTRIBUTION THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. THAT ROAD PLAN, LET ME JUST SAY, HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED -- HAS BEEN HEARD IN THE COMMUNITY. WE HAVE TAKEN IT TO EIGHT OR NINE PUBLIC MEETINGS. WE'VE WORKED WITH MPO STAFF AND LOOKED AT THE PRIORITIES OF MPO, AND IN ADDITION, A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THAT -- ON THAT ROAD PLAN, AND NUMBER ONE IS THAT ALL PROJECTS THAT WERE DEVELOPER FUNDED HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THAT ROAD PLAN. AS WELL THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT HAS LANGUAGE IN IT THAT SPECIFICALLY INDICATES THAT THERE ARE MULTIPLE, MULTIPLE STEPS FOR THE BOARD TO CONSIDER IF THERE WERE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE FUTURE FOR THIS ROAD PLAN TO INCLUDE ANY PROJECTS THAT MIGHT HAVE DEVELOPER FUNDING. IT IS -- THERE ARE MULTIPLE STEPS, FIVE HURDLES THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AND PASSED BEFORE THERE WOULD BE ANY ACTION TO LOOK AT ANY DEVELOPER-FUNDED PROJECTS, SO WE BELIEVE THE SAFEGUARDS ARE IN PLACE. A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. THERE -- AS WE MENTIONED BEFORE LAST TIME WE WERE HERE, TRAILS HAVE BEEN ACTUALLY REMOVED FROM THE PLAN AND REPLACED WITH SOME ENHANCED -- SOME ENHANCED PAVED SHOULDERS, AND THAT IS REALLY A -- A RESTRICTION THAT WE HAVE WITH THIS LEGISLATION THAT WE'RE USING, THE SURTAX LEGISLATION. I THINK I'VE HIT ON THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE KEY THINGS, THREE -- THREE KEY INGREDIENTS, AN ORDINANCE, AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, AND THEN A ROAD AND TRANSIT PROJECT LIST. MAY 13th, 6:00, ALL PEOPLES CENTER IS THE KEY TIME, AND WE'RE MOVING AHEAD AND WE'RE MAKING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR A SIGNIFICANT CROWD AT THAT MEETING. I WILL STOP AND JUST ASK IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BECAUSE I THINK THAT MAY BE A BETTER WAY TO NOW PROCEED AND SEE IF IT THERE'S ANYTHING SPECIFIC THAT YOUR BOARD MIGHT HAVE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, LUCIA. OKAY. MS. SAUL-SENA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I HAVE A QUESTION. WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE MPO TO -- AND I'VE BEEN AWAY -- BUT TO OFFICIALLY ENDORSE THIS AND ENCOURAGE THE COUNTY COMMISSION'S SWIFT ACTION ON THIS? I THINK IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE. I'LL MAKE THAT AS A MOTION. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ENDORSE -- WRITE A LETTER AND ENDORSE THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE. >>LUCIA GARSYS: YES. >>KEVIN BECKNER: I'LL SECOND THAT IF I DON'T HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST [INAUDIBLE] >>JOE AFFRONTI: ADAM. >>ADAM GORMLY: I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THAT WOULD POSE A -- A CONFLICT FOR YOU TO VOTE ON THAT MOTION. IT DOESN'T INURE TO YOUR PRIVATE GAIN OR LOSS. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: ONLY THE QUALITY OF OUR COMMUNITY. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. >>ROSE FERLITA: I DON'T WANT TO THROW A WRENCH INTO THIS, BUT THAT MEANS WE COULD ENDORSE THE LETTER AND NOT SUPPORT THE REFERENDUM? >>ADAM GORMLY: THAT'S CORRECT. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: SURE. >>ROSE FERLITA: OKAY. THAT SENDS A VERY CLEAR MESSAGE. I'M NOT SAYING THAT THAT'S HAPPENING, BUT I'M JUST -- >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? >>RICHARD WAINIO: I'M NOT SURE, WHAT IS THIS LETTER GOING TO SAY? >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: IT'S GOING TO SAY WE ENDORSE THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: JUST TO GIVE THE BOARD SOME COMFORT, OUR MPO PLAN THAT WAS ADOPTED THAT WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY DID HAVE THE PENNY SALES TAX IN IT AS A FUNDING SOURCE, SO YOU WOULDN'T BE TAKING AN ACTION INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT YOU'VE DONE BEFORE. >>RICHARD WAINIO: SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING JUST SIMPLY THAT THAT REFERENDUM FOR THE PENNY SALES TAX GET PUT ON A BALLOT? >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: CORRECT. >>RICHARD WAINIO: THAT'S -- YEAH. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: CORRECT. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES] OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, LUCIA. OKAY. AIR QUALITY UPDATE AND REVISION OF THE CRITERIA, REGINALD SANFORD. >>REGINALD SANFORD: GOOD MORNING, BOARD MEMBERS. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: GOOD MORNING. >>REGINALD SANFORD: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. REGGIE SANFORD, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION STAFF. TODAY'S PRESENTATION WILL REALLY BE AN UPDATE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS. IF I MAY TURN YOUR ATTENTION TO THE SCREEN, PLEASE. LET'S BEGIN WITH WHY WE DO WHAT WE DO. IT'S BEEN LONG ESTABLISHED THAT EVEN SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE TO AIR POLLUTION CAN LEAD TO SERIOUS RESPIRATORY AND CARDIOVASCULAR ILLNESSES. POLLUTION BLOCKS AIR AND VASCULAR PASSAGEWAYS AND IRRITATES SENSITIVE TISSUE. THAT BEING SAID, EPA HAS ESTABLISHED STANDARDS FOR THE EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS WITH THE GOAL TO BETTER PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH, WHICH IS WHY EPA REQUIRES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION TO MONITOR FOR CERTAIN POLLUTANTS THAT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO HAVE A DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON OUR HEALTH. IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY EPC DOES THE MONITORING THROUGH A NETWORK OF AIR MONITORS THAT ARE STRATEGICALLY PLACED IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. WE CONSTANTLY EVALUATE OUR PLACEMENT OF THESE MONITORS. WE MONITOR FOR THE SIX POLLUTANTS ON YOUR LEFT. LATER I'LL SPEAK ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL STANDARDS OF SEVERAL OF THESE POLLUTANTS. THIS IS ACTUALLY AN AIR QUALITY MONITORING STATION HERE. EPA CONSIDERS WHETHER AN AREA IS MEETING THE FEDERAL STANDARDS AND DESIGNATES ITS COMPLIANCE AS EITHER ATTAINING THE STANDARDS, MAINTAINING THEM, OR VARYING DEGREES OF NOT ATTAINING THEM. AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE TABLE, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY IS ATTAINING FOUR OF THE STANDARDS, BUT WE ARE FAILING TO MEET THE STANDARDS SET FOR OZONE AND LEAD. EPA IS IN THE PROCESS OF REVISING THE OZONE STANDARD TO MAKE IT EVEN MORE STRINGENT. GROUND-LEVEL OZONE IS NOT EMITTED DIRECTLY INTO THE AIR. ACTUALLY IT'S -- IT'S A CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATION THAT OCCURS WHEN NITROGEN AND VOLATILE ORGANICS ARE COMBINED AND REACT IN THE PRESENCE OF SUNLIGHT. THE SOURCES OF THESE CHEMICALS ARE GENERALLY INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES, THE VEHICLES THAT WE DRIVE, AND SOME CHEMICAL SOLVENTS. THE GREATEST TIME OF CONCERN FOR HIGH OZONE LEVELS ARE IN THE SPRINGTIME AND ALSO IN THE SUMMER. NEARLY 40 YEARS AGO EPA REALIZED THE HEALTH RAMIFICATIONS OF HIGH OZONE LEVELS AND SET A STANDARD BASED ON THE HEALTH STUDIES AT THAT TIME. AS -- AS THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF OZONE BECAME BETTER UNDERSTOOD, EPA REFINED THOSE STANDARDS AND THE STANDARDS ACTUALLY BECAME MORE RESTRICTIVE. THE CURRENT STANDARD FOR OZONE IS 75 PARTS PER BILLION OVER AN EIGHT-HOUR PERIOD. EPA WILL BE LOWERING THAT STANDARD TO SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 60 AND 70 PARTS PER BILLION. I MIGHT JUST SAY LOCALLY WE'VE SEEN MAJOR REDUCTIONS IN THE OZONE-FORMING CHEMICALS. THIS IS IN LARGE PART DUE TO THE REFUELING OF THE OLD TECO GANNON PLANT, SO WHEN THEY WENT FROM BURNING COAL TO NATURAL GAS, THAT MADE A MAJOR DIFFERENCE IN THE OZONE -- IN OUR OZONE LEVELS HERE LOCALLY, BUT EVEN WITH THAT, WE'RE STILL FALLING SHORT OF THE 75 PART PER BILLION STANDARD. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY'S NOT ATTAINING THE STANDARD, BUT NEITHER ARE SEVERAL OTHER COUNTIES IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. PRESENTLY THERE ARE PROBABLY ABOUT SIX OR SEVEN COUNTIES THAT ARE HAVING PROBLEMS. IF EPA WERE TO REDUCE THE STANDARD OR LOWER THE STANDARD TO 70 PARTS PER BILLION, YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS MAP HERE THERE'LL PROBABLY BE ABOUT 15 COUNTIES THAT WILL BE NONATTAINING. IF THEY WERE TO FURTHER REDUCE IT TO 65 PARTS PER BILLION, YOU'LL VIRTUALLY HAVE THREE-QUARTERS OF THE STATE THAT WOULD FALL INTO OZONE NONATTAINMENT. SO WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE A NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION? FEDERAL LAW REQUIRES THAT THE STATE -- THAT WOULD BE THE STATE DEP -- SUBMIT A CLEANUP PLAN. THIS PLAN WOULD BE A BLUEPRINT FOR DEMONSTRATING HOW THE COUNTY WILL MEET THE NEW STANDARD. THE PLAN IS USUALLY A COMBINATION OF CONTROLS AND REGULATIONS. THIS MPO BOARD WILL BE REQUIRED TO CAREFULLY EXAMINE ALL AIR QUALITY -- I'M SORRY, ALL TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR AIR QUALITY BENEFIT. THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH A PROCESS CALLED A CONFORMITY PROCESS. THIS IS BASICALLY A COMPUTER MODELING EXERCISE THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE CONDUCTED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT NEW OR EXPANDED ROADS WOULD NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE GOALS OF THE STATE PLAN. STATION AREA AIR POLLUTION SOURCES SUCH AS INDUSTRIES COULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE -- INSTALL MORE COSTLY CONTROLS, AND ONCE AGAIN, THIS AREA WOULD ALSO BE ELIGIBLE FOR CMAQ FUNDS. THAT STANDS FOR CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY. THOSE FUNDS ARE MADE AVAILABLE FOR TRANSPORTATION-RELATED PROJECTS THAT CONTRIBUTE POSITIVELY TO OUR AIR QUALITY. HERE'S THE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW STANDARD. THE OZONE STANDARD WOULD GO FINAL IN AUGUST OF THIS YEAR. STATE DEP WILL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON WHICH COUNTIES SHOULD BE NONATTAINING BY NEXT JANUARY, AND THE DESIGNATIONS WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE NEXT AUGUST. TWO YEARS LATER AFTER THAT, IN 2013, THE STATE WOULD HAVE TO SUBMIT THEIR CLEANUP PLAN. APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AGO EPA LOWERED THE STANDARD FOR LEAD. THEY'RE ALSO BRINGING ABOUT CHANGES TO THE WAY THAT WE MONITOR FOR LEAD. IN THE PAST, PROBABLY IN THE LATE '70s, OUR GASOLINE CONTAINED, YOU KNOW, HIGH QUANTITIES, HIGH AMOUNTS OF LEAD, AND THAT WAS PHASED OUT. NOW THE MAJOR SOURCES OF LEAD ARE INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES. LEAD IS A CONTAMINANT, IT'S A HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT, AND THERE ARE NO SAFE LEVELS OF LEAD IN THE BODY, AND CHILDREN SUFFER THE MOST FROM IT. THE PICTURE AT THE RIGHT IS ACTUALLY A -- AN X-RAY OF A PATIENT THAT HAS HIGH LEAD LEVELS. THE DARK OUTLINE IS LEAD BUILDUP IN THE BONES. EPA IS NOT PROPOSING TO FURTHER CHANGE THE LEAD STANDARD, BUT THEY ARE RECOMMENDING THAT MONITORS BE PLACED AT SOURCES THAT EMIT AT LEAST A HALF A TON OF LEAD PER YEAR. THE IMPACT ON US WOULD BE THAT WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PLACE MONITORS AROUND THE SINGLE BATTERY MANUFACTURER IN THE COUNTY. THAT WOULD BE JOHNSON CONTROLS. WITH THESE NEW LEAD REQUIREMENTS, EPA IS ALSO PROPOSING TO TREAT SMALL AIRPORTS THE SAME AS OTHER LEAD SOURCES BECAUSE A SMALL AIRPORT, THE FUEL THAT POWERS THESE PISTON-DRIVEN ENGINES STILL CONTAINS LEAD, BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT WE DON'T EXPECT IT TO AFFECT ANY OF THE AIRPORTS IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. IN FACT, I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT THE CLOSEST AIRPORT THAT MIGHT BE IMPACTED BY THIS NEW STANDARD WOULD BE IN THE DAYTONA BEACH AREA. THIS IS OUR CURRENT LEAD MONITORING NETWORK. IT'S -- KIND OF SURROUNDS A COMPANY CALLED ENVIROFOCUS. THEY ARE A SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER. THEY ARE -- THEY TAKE LEAD AND -- LIKE LEAD BATTERIES AND RECYCLE IT. WE ARE EXPECTING TO ADD SIX ADDITIONAL MONITORS BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES IN THE STANDARDS. IT'S GOING TO COST MONEY TO DO THAT, AND WE'RE GOING TO SEEK FEDERAL FUNDING TO PAY FOR IT. AND THE FINAL STANDARD THAT I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT TODAY IS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER. MOST PEOPLE PROBABLY REFER TO IT AS DUST. I'D LIKE TO SHOW THIS SLIDE TO PUT INTO PERSPECTIVE THE SIZE OF PARTICLES WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. THIS IS A MAGNIFICATION OF A SINGLE HUMAN HAIR. THE SIZE PARTICLE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, THIS PM 2.5 MICRONS HERE IS ACTUALLY LESS THAN 5% OF THE DIAMETER OF A SINGLE PARTICLE OF HAIR. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: WOW. >>REGINALD SANFORD: THIS IS HOW SMALL A PARTICLE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. THE PROBLEM WITH SMALL PARTICULATES IS THEY BECOME DEEPLY EMBEDDED IN OUR LUNGS AND THEY CAN HAVE TOXICS AND DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS ALSO. IF WE WERE TO TAKE THE PROPOSED STANDARD AND KIND OF OVERLAY IT ON SOME RECENT DATA, WE'LL SEE THAT IN GENERAL WE DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE NEW PARTICULATE MATTER STANDARD. THE ONLY EXCEPTION WOULD PROBABLY BE HERE IN 2007. YOU CAN SEE THAT JUST ABOUT ALL THE MONITORS THAT WE HAD WOULD HAVE DEMONSTRATED EXCEEDING THE PROPOSED STANDARD. THIS IS BECAUSE WE HAD A LA NINA WEATHER YEAR. THE CONDITIONS WERE VERY DRY, AND WE ALSO HAD THE FLORIDA FIRES THAT WERE GOING ON THAT YEAR. EPA HAS DEVISED A WAY FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO GET DAILY AIR POLLUTION INFORMATION. IT'S CALLED THE AIR QUALITY INDEX. IT'S GENERATED FROM COLLECTED MONITORING DATA THAT WE RECEIVE ON THE -- AT OUR MONITORS. THERE WAS IN AN EARLIER SLIDE. AND WHAT THEY DO, THEY TAKE THE DATA AND THEY TRY TO SYNTHESIZE IT INTO A SINGLE NUMBER, SO IF THE DATA WERE TO FALL WITHIN ONE AND 50, WE WOULD KNOW THAT THE QUALITY WOULD BE GOOD. IF WE LOOK BACK AT 2009, WE CAN SEE THAT MOST DAYS OUR AIR QUALITY IS GOOD. IT'S ONLY MAYBE A SMALL PERCENTAGE -- WELL, A FRACTION THAT IT'S CONSIDERED MODERATE, AND FROM TIME TO TIME IT'S UNHEALTHY FOR SENSITIVE GROUPS. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ALSO MENTION THAT YOU CAN CALL THE AIR QUALITY INDEX NUMBER HERE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLIDE, AND WE ALSO REPORT IT TO THE ST. PETERSBURG TIMES. IF YOU LOOK ON THE BACK -- THE BACK SECTION OF THE SPORTS, YOU'LL SEE THE AIR QUALITY INDEX REPORTED THERE, AND IT'S ALSO REPORTED NATIONALLY IN "USA TODAY." ALL OF THAT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BY OUR EPC MONITORING STAFF. I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T MENTION SOME OF THE LOCAL EFFORTS THAT ARE GOING ON. I KNOW WE DIDN'T INCLUDE GREENHOUSE GASES AS PART OF TODAY'S DISCUSSION, BUT I WANTED TO MENTION SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE WORKING ON IN COORDINATION WITH COMMISSIONER FERLITA'S OFFICE. THE COMMISSIONER HAS ESTABLISHED A WORK GROUP TO LOOK AT STRATEGIES TO REDUCE OUR COMMUNITY'S ENERGY USE AND FURTHER PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT. THE GROUP ENCOURAGES THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS. THEY SPONSORED AN ENERGY FORUM THIS PAST JANUARY, AND THEY HAD A NICE TURNOUT, APPROXIMATELY 175 PEOPLE, AND THROUGH OUR COORDINATION WITH THAT GROUP, WE'VE ESTABLISHED AN OFFICE OF SUSTAINABILITY, AND THAT OFFICE WAS ESTABLISHED USING FEDERAL FUNDS. AND LASTLY, EPC IS HOSTING THE CLEAN AIR FAIR. IT'S AN ANNUAL EVENT. IT WILL BE LOCATED AT POLK -- I'M SORRY, POE PLAZA, DOWNTOWN TAMPA. IT'LL BE THIS THURSDAY FROM 11:30 TO 1:30, AND WE HOPE AND ENCOURAGE ALL OF YOU TO COME DOWN AND VISIT. WE HAVE A LOT OF VISITORS. WE HAVE A GOOD TEAM WORKING ON IT. AND THAT PRETTY MUCH CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION FOR TODAY. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, MR. SANFORD. ANY QUESTIONS? YES, MR. BECKNER. >>KEVIN BECKNER: THANK YOU, MR. SANFORD. A COUPLE QUESTIONS. >>REGINALD SANFORD: SURE. >>KEVIN BECKNER: IS THERE ANY -- HAVE WE IDENTIFIED ANY MAIN REASONS WHY OUR REGION OR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY IS NOT MEETING THE STANDARDS FOR OZONE AND LEAD? I MEAN, IS THERE ANYTHING YOUR AGENCY CAN POINT DIRECTLY TO SAY THIS IS WHY WE'RE NOT MEETING THOSE STANDARDS? >>REGINALD SANFORD: WELL, I GUESS TO LOOK BACK HISTORICALLY, THE CLEANUP THAT OCCURRED AT TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY WAS MAJOR FOR THIS AREA, AND THAT HELPED REDUCE OUR LEVELS GREATLY. THE PROBLEM NOT JUST IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, BUT THERE ARE PROBABLY 300 COUNTIES NATIONWIDE THAT WILL FAIL TO MEET THE NEW OZONE STANDARD, AND THAT'S BECAUSE EPA IS LOWERING THE BAR, SO ALTHOUGH WE'RE DOING THINGS LOCALLY TO IMPROVE OUR AIR QUALITY, THE STANDARD BECOMES MORE RESTRICTIVE BECAUSE THEY'RE LOWERING THE BAR. AS FAR AS LEAD GOES, THE ONLY ISSUES THAT WE HAVE ARE AROUND THE SECONDARY SMELTER THAT I TOLD YOU ABOUT, AND THEY'VE GOT SOME MAJOR WORK GOING ON THERE WHERE THEY'RE BASICALLY ENCAPSULATING THE WHOLE FACILITY, AND THAT WORK SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT TWO TO THREE YEARS, SO ONCE THAT IS DONE, WE EXPECT TO HAVE -- TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LEAD STANDARD. >>KEVIN BECKNER: OKAY. NOW LET ME ASK A QUESTION AS I REPRESENT THREE DIFFERENT AGENCIES HERE. FROM THE MPO'S STANDPOINT, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO OR SHOULD CONSIDER IN OUR LONG-TERM PLANNING THAT COULD REDUCE OR HELP US COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE OZONE AND THE -- OR THE LEAD STANDARDS? >>REGINALD SANFORD: I WOULD SAY FOR -- FOR THIS MPO AND ALSO ALL THE MPOs ACROSS THE NATION, THE GOVERNMENT IS PUTTING AIR QUALITY AT A PREMIUM, SO AS PLANS COME THROUGH, I WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW, TAKE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR THE AIR QUALITY, YOU KNOW, BENEFIT OF THOSE PLANS. THAT WILL BE SOMETHING THAT STAFF WILL GIVE TO YOU, AND THAT IS ALSO SOMETHING THAT THE CONFORMITY PROCESS REQUIRES. IT HAS TO BE DONE BECAUSE NO -- NEITHER THE LONG-RANGE PLAN, THE -- THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN, OR ANY OF THOSE PLANS CAN BE APPROVED UNLESS THEY PASS, YOU KNOW, THE AIR QUALITY TEST. >>KEVIN BECKNER: AND WHAT ABOUT FROM THE EPC'S STANDPOINT, IS THERE ANYTHING AS THE EPC BOARD WE SHOULD BE CONSIDERING OR LOOKING AT IMPLEMENTING POLICYWISE OR DOING SOMETHING THAT WOULD HELP THAT? >>REGINALD SANFORD: WELL, I GUESS I REALLY COULDN'T SPEAK FROM THE STANDPOINT OF RECOMMENDING POLICY, I'LL LEAVE THAT TO MY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BUT WE WILL BE COMING TO OUR BOARD MEMBERS IN THE COMING MONTHS AS THINGS BECOME MORE FINITE. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S GOING TO TAKE PLACE IN THE MONTHS COMING IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE MEETING WITH THE FEDERAL - - THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE THE ONES TO DECIDE WHICH TYPES OF PROJECTS OR IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ARE BEST FOR -- FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA, INCLUDING HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. SO WE JUST LOOK TO GIVE YOU-ALL UPDATES ALONG THE WAY AND LOOK FOR YOUR SUPPORT IN, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THOSE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ARE. >>KEVIN BECKNER: ALL RIGHT. AND THE LAST HAT, AS THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, I GIVE A LOT OF CREDIT TO MY COLLEAGUE, COMMISSIONER FERLITA, WHO I THINK HAS DONE SOME TREMENDOUS THINGS IN MOVING FORWARD AND LOOKING AT ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND SUCH. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE AS A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THAT WE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT THAT STANDS OUT TO YOU TO ADDRESS MEETING THOSE STANDARDS? >>REGINALD SANFORD: I WOULD SAY PROMOTING CLEAN FUELS, PROMOTING ENERGY CONSERVATION TYPE THINGS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, AND ALSO PROMOTING IT TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC BECAUSE A LOT OF THE, YOU KNOW, POLLUTION THAT WE HAVE IS KIND OF DRIVEN BY OUR PERSONAL PRACTICES, AND THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE COULD DO TO, YOU KNOW, HELP OURSELVES OUT INDIVIDUALLY, SAVE OURSELVES MONEY, AND ALSO SAVE FROM POLLUTING THE ENVIRONMENT. >>KEVIN BECKNER: GREAT. THANK YOU. >>REGINALD SANFORD: YOU'RE WELCOME. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. YES. >>ROSE FERLITA: GO AHEAD. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: I JUST WANTED TO SAY I THINK THIS MPO IN ADOPTING A PLAN THAT'S VERY MULTIMODAL IN DIRECTION LAST DECEMBER MADE A HUGE STEP IN THE DIRECTION OF DEALING WITH THE ISSUES THAT REGGIE'S BROUGHT UP SINCE IT HAS SUCH A MUCH BIGGER TRANSIT COMPONENT THAN WE'VE HAD BEFORE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: MS. FERLITA. >>ROSE FERLITA: I JUST WANT TO FIRST THANK YOU, KEVIN, FOR THOSE COMMENTS, AND I REALLY WOULD BE REMISS IF I JUST SAT HERE AND TOOK THAT COMPLIMENT WITHOUT EXTENDING IT TO THE PEOPLE THAT REALLY HAVE DONE THE WORK. THE PARTNERSHIP THAT WE HAVE ON THAT ENERGY GROUP IS CONTINUING TO EXPAND AND EXPAND AND EXPAND. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I THINK NEXT BOCC MEETING, NOT TOMORROW, WE'RE GOING TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON WHAT WE'RE DOING AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO AND EXPAND THOSE EFFORTS REGIONALLY. I KNOW MR. BECKNER SITS ON THE REGIONAL COUNCIL, AND HE KNOWS WE HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. PUMARIEGA AND ARE COMING FORWARD WITH AN ISSUE THAT IS EXPANDING IN TERMS OF REGIONAL PARTICIPATION, SO IT CONTINUES TO GROW, AND THERE ARE MANY, MANY PLAYERS IN LOOKING AT OTHER THINGS IN TERMS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, SO THANKS TO EPC. THEY'VE BEEN GREAT PARTNERS, AND THAT WHOLE GROUP IS JUST PHENOMENAL. >>REGINALD SANFORD: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: MR. WAINIO. >>RICHARD WAINIO: SEVERAL THINGS. FIRST OF ALL, JUST FOR THE RECORD, WE ALL OBVIOUSLY WANT A COUNTY THAT MEETS ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS AND IN FACT EXCEEDS AND IS BETTER THAN -- THAN -- THAN THE STANDARDS. THERE'S NOTHING PROBABLY MORE IMPORTANT TO US THAN -- THAN HAVING A CLEAN AND HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT. THAT -- THAT SAID, WE ALSO WANT TO BALANCE THAT WITH THE BUSINESS INTERESTS OF OUR COMMUNITY. WE WANT TO BE BUSINESS FRIENDLY AND WE WANT TO CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH CERTAIN TYPES OF INDUSTRIES CAN -- CAN FLOURISH. WE HAVE SOME PRETTY STRICT STANDARDS HERE IN THIS COUNTY NOW. IN FACT, SOME OF OUR STANDARDS SEEM TO BE -- AT A COUNTY LEVEL ARE MORE STRICT THAN NEARBY COUNTIES, AND THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT AT TIMES TO COMPETE IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIES. I HAVE A PARTICULAR QUESTION, THOUGH. YOU SAID THAT WE APPARENTLY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM NOW WITH PARTICULATES, WITH SMALL PARTICLES WITH -- THAT ISSUE? THAT'S NOT A PROBLEM? WE ARE OKAY? AND IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STRENGTHENS THOSE STANDARDS THAT WE STILL WON'T HAVE A PROBLEM AS A COUNTY, IF I UNDERSTOOD THAT CORRECT, BUT TAKING THAT TO A DIFFERENT LEVEL, ARE THERE PARTICULAR INDUSTRIES AND PARTICULAR TYPES OF ACTIVITIES THAT -- THAT MAY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE STRICTER STANDARDS? AND I'M OBVIOUSLY TALKING DIRECTLY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MANY OF THOSE INDUSTRIES THAT -- THAT WE SUPPORT AT THE PORT, CEMENT, AGGREGATE LIMESTONE, ALL OF THESE INDUSTRIES THAT ARE SO IMPORTANT TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION, THE STATE, THE COUNTY. WE AT TIMES HAVE A GOOD DEAL OF TROUBLE TRYING TO -- TO GET PERMITS AND MEET -- MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. IS ANYTHING HAPPENING HERE THAT THAT'S GOING -- THAT'S GOING TO MAKE THAT EVEN MORE DIFFICULT FOR THESE -- FOR THESE COMPANIES? AND -- AND LASTLY, IF -- IF THESE NEW RULES GO INTO EFFECT, WILL THE REQUIREMENTS BE THE SAME FOR A COMPANY THAT'S IN EXISTENCE NOW VERSUS A NEW COMPANY THAT'S COMING IN, OR WILL THERE BE SOME GRANDFATHERING? WILL THERE BE ANY DIFFERENT TIMETABLE FOR A -- YOU KNOW, A COMPANY THAT'S ALREADY HERE TO MODIFY ITS ACTIVITIES IF IT HAS TO, OR WILL IT APPLY TO NEW COMPANIES PRIMARILY? HOW DO YOU SEE THIS PLAYING OUT? >>REGINALD SANFORD: WELL, IT'S OUR ESTIMATION THAT WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE PARTICULATE -- THE PARTICULATE STANDARD. I GUESS ONE THING I DIDN'T MENTION IN THE PRESENTATION BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO GET REALLY WORDY, BUT THERE IS AN AREA IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY -- IF WERE YOU TO LOOK AT THE MAP, IT'S PRETTY MUCH THE CENTER PORTION OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, THAT IS DESIGNATED AS MAINTENANCE BY THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SO THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO DO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT MAINTENANCE DESIGNATION. THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO DO THAT -- YOU KNOW, THAT REALLY CAN'T BE CHANGED BECAUSE IT'S IN OUR MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PARTICULATE MATTER. AS FAR AS ANY NEW REQUIREMENTS THAT MAY COME DOWN THE PIKE, THOSE WOULD BE DEVELOPED BY THE FDEP IN CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WITH LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCIES SUCH AS OURS. ACTUALLY, THE LAST TIME WHEN WE WERE IN NONATTAINMENT IN THE EARLY '90s, THEY CONSULTED WITH TRANSIT, THEY CONSULTED WITH MPO BOARDS ACROSS THE STATE, SO WE'RE A LITTLE BIT -- WE'RE NOT ENOUGH INTO THE PROCESS TO KNOW WHAT THOSE FINAL REQUIREMENTS ARE GOING TO BE. WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS GOING TO BE ANY GRANDFATHERING, I REALLY COULDN'T SPEAK TO THAT. IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A QUESTION -- IT WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED BY SOMEONE FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. BUT THERE COULD BE NEW CONTROLS PLACED ON INDUSTRY AS FAR AS OZONE GOES BECAUSE OZONE IS THE ONE THAT WE'RE NOT ATTAINING RIGHT NOW. I WOULDN'T ANTICIPATE WE WOULD HAVE ANY NEW CONTROLS ON PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCES UNLESS WE WERE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH PARTICULATE MATTER AND MAINTAINING THE PARTICULATE STANDARD. >>RICHARD WAINIO: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THOSE WERE EXCELLENT QUESTIONS. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: MARK HAS A QUESTION. >>JOE AFFRONTI: WHAT? >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: I THINK MARK. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. YES, MR. -- >>MARK SHARPE: SO FOR 2011, NONATTAINMENT, WHAT ARE WE AT RISK OF FINDING OURSELVES IN NONATTAINMENT FOR? >>REGINALD SANFORD: IN 2011 WE WILL BE IN NONATTAINMENT FOR OZONE AND ALSO WE'LL HAVE TO CHANGE THE WAY WE DO OUR LEAD MONITORING, AND WE EXPECT TO BE NONATTAINMENT FOR LEAD ALSO. THE LEAD HASN'T BEEN FINALIZED YET. THE OZONE WE'RE SURE ABOUT. >>MARK SHARPE: OKAY. AND THE IMPACT ON OUR COUNTY WITH REGARD TO NONATTAINMENT FOR OZONE, ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT WE GET THIS NONATTAINMENT STATUS, WHAT -- IS THERE -- IS THERE A -- IS THERE AN IMPACT? I MEAN, FOR INSTANCE, LET'S JUST SAY THAT WE -- WE -- WE'RE IN NONATTAINMENT AND WE DECIDE THAT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO TO -- WELL, FIRST OFF, WHAT CONTRIBUTES TO THE OZONE -- OUR NONATTAINMENT? WHAT'S THE SINGULAR LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OUR NONATTAINMENT FOR OZONE? >>REGINALD SANFORD: LOCALLY -- AND IT DEPENDS ON THE REGION, BUT LOCALLY THE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS OR CONTRIBUTING SECTORS TO OUR NONATTAINMENT ARE THREE CATEGORIES, INDUSTRIAL SOURCES, MOBILE SOURCES, AND THEN SOMETHING CALLED AREA SOURCES, WHICH IS, YOU KNOW -- AREA SOURCES ARE LIKE OUR LAWN MOWERS, YOU KNOW, SPRAY PAINT FACILITIES THAT GENERATE A LOT OF CHEMICALS JUST BASED ON THE SHEER VOLUME, SO IF YOU WERE TO TAKE THE ENTIRE GROUP OF CHEMICALS, YOU COULD SPLIT IT UP INTO THOSE THREE SECTORS. NOW, COMMISSIONER SHARPE, I THINK YOU WERE MAYBE GETTING AT SOME OF THE REPERCUSSIONS OF HAVING THAT NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION. I GUESS IN THEORY IT COULD DISSUADE, YOU KNOW, CERTAIN BUSINESSES FROM MOVING TO OR RELOCATING TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT IF THEY'RE AN AIR POLLUTION SOURCE, THEY MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL MORE COSTLY CONTROLS, SO, YOU KNOW, IN THEORY, A BUSINESS COULD GO TO A COUNTY THAT WASN'T HAVING AIR QUALITY PROBLEMS AND THEY COULD OPERATE AT A LOWER EXPENSE. >>MARK SHARPE: WOULD IT IN ANY WAY EFFECT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S FUNDING OF ANY OF OUR FUTURE ROAD PROJECTS IF WE WERE TO HAVE -- IF WE WERE TO BE IN NONATTAINMENT AND WE DID NOT HAVE A SUITABLE OR ADEQUATE TRANSIT PLAN FOR MITIGATION OF CONGESTION? >>REGINALD SANFORD: IF WE WERE TO BE NONATTAINMENT AND NOT PROPERLY ADDRESS THE PROBLEM ON A -- ON AN IDENTIFIED SCHEDULE, IT COULD AFFECT FEDERAL FUNDING THAT WOULD BE RECEIVED FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS. NOW, IT'S NOT THE TYPE OF THING THAT EPA DOES, YOU KNOW, JUST FROM ONE YEAR TO THE NEXT. IT'S A SITUATION WHERE THEY WORK WITH COMMUNITIES IF THEY CAN'T DEMONSTRATE, YOU KNOW, AN ADEQUATE PLAN TO COME BACK INTO ATTAINMENT. IT HAPPENED -- ACTUALLY HAPPENED UP IN ATLANTA AFTER THE '96 OLYMPICS. THEY HAD PLANS THAT DIDN'T CONFORM TO THE AIR QUALITY GOALS, SO THERE WAS A PERIOD THERE WHERE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED SOME OF THE FUNDING THAT WENT TO THE GREATER METROPOLITAN ATLANTA AREA. >>MARK SHARPE: YOU KNOW, THIS -- THIS MPO TOOK AS ONE OF ITS TOP PRIORITIES THE -- THE CONNECTOR BETWEEN THE CROSSTOWN AND I-4 TO TRY TO GET THE TRUCKS, 10,000 TRUCKS A DAY, OFF THE LOCAL STREETS AND KIND OF FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF TRUCKS FROM THE PORT OUT TO THE REGION. IF YOU HAVE A BOTTLENECK OF TRUCKS PUMPING CO2 INTO THE ATMOSPHERE, DOES THAT WORSEN OR -- OUR ABILITY TO MEET THE -- OUR -- TO MEET THE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? >>REGINALD SANFORD: IDLING TRAFFIC IS A CONTRIBUTOR TO AIR POLLUTION. THE IDEA IS TO, NUMBER ONE, REDUCE THE TRAFFIC FROM THE ROAD, YOU KNOW, REDUCE TOTAL -- >>MARK SHARPE: WE HAVE AN IDLING PROBLEM HERE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. I KNOW THAT WE DON'T SEEM TO RANK VERY WELL WHEN YOU LOOK AT FORBES AND OTHER -- OTHER -- EVEN THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE RANKED US 11th WORST OUT OF 90 METROPOLITAN AREAS FOR CONGESTION, BUT I'M WONDERING, DO YOU THINK IN ANY WAY OUR LOW -- LOW STANDARD FOR TRANSIT CONTRIBUTES TO -- TO CONGESTION AND THAT IN ANY WAY CONTRIBUTES TO THIS NONATTAINMENT? >>REGINALD SANFORD: WELL, I CAN'T SAY WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE AN IDLING PROBLEM BASED ON STUDIES, THOSE STUDIES BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN THEM, BUT I CAN SAY IN GENERAL IF YOU HAVE SINGLE-OCCUPANT VEHICLES, YOU KNOW, EVERYONE DRIVING THEIR OWN CAR AS OPPOSED OF TRIP CHAINING OR COMBINING MORE PEOPLE INTO A SINGLE VEHICLE, THAT WOULD BE THE OPTIMAL THING. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: JUST VERY QUICKLY. I JUST WANTED TO REMIND THE BOARD HOW IT IMPACTED THE MPO DIRECTLY IS THAT OUR PLAN WOULD HAVE TO BE UPDATED EVERY FOUR YEARS INSTEAD OF EVERY FIVE YEARS WHEN WE FALL OUT OF NONATTAINMENT, SO THAT'S AN EFFECT THAT'S IMMEDIATE ON US. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? >>MARK SHARPE: THANK YOU. THAT'S A VERY GOOD REPORT. THANK YOU, SIR. >>REGINALD SANFORD: THANK YOU, MR. SHARPE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: AND I HOPE THAT YOU'LL KEEP US POSTED IN THE FUTURE AS TO ANY CHANGES OR ANY ADDITIONS OR WHATEVER TO THE REGULATIONS SO WE'LL BE KEPT ABREAST OF -- >>REGINALD SANFORD: WE WILL, AND WE THANK YOU FOR HAVING US HERE TODAY. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY. NEXT IS THE GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS, SUZI DIERINGER. >>SUZI DIERINGER: YES, GOOD MORNING. I'M HERE TO TELL YOU ABOUT THE GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT PROCESS WE'RE UNDERGOING AS WE SPEAK, BUT FIRST LET ME TELL YOU WHAT GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS ARE. THEY ASSIST MPO STAFF. THOSE ARE WHEN -- WHEN WE HIRE CONSULTANTS TO DO PROJECTS FOR US, THEY'RE ASSISTING US ON THE TASKS IDENTIFIED IN THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM. THEY ALSO PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT -- WE DON'T ALWAYS HAVE THE EXPERTISE IN CERTAIN AREAS -- AND THEN THEY PROVIDE GENERAL PLANNING SUPPORT. WE ARE SHORT-STAFFED AT TIMES, AND SO THEY'RE JUST HELPFUL TO AID STAFF. THE LAST SELECTION PROCESS WAS DONE IN 2005. WE PICKED THREE CONSULTANTS FOR TWO-YEAR CONTRACTS, WHICH WERE EXTENDABLE IN ONE-YEAR INCREMENTS FOR UP TO FIVE YEARS. ALL THREE OF THOSE CONSULTANTS WERE EXTENDED, AND THEY'RE ALL DUE TO EXPIRE THIS FALL. SO WE'VE BEGUN THE SELECTION PROCESS BY PUTTING AN AD IN THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE WEEKLY. IT APPEARED IN THE APRIL 16th WEEK. WE'VE ASKED FOR A LETTER OF RESPONSE FROM THOSE FIRMS INTERESTED IN BEING ONE OF THE POTENTIALS TO BE SELECTED. HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET A LOT OF RESPONSES, AND FROM THAT WE WILL NARROW IT DOWN TO TEN OR LESS FIRMS. THAT'S THE SHORTLIST. ONCE WE'VE DONE THAT, WE MAY ASK THOSE FIRMS TO COME BACK AND DO A WRITTEN PROPOSAL AND GIVE AN ORAL -- OR MAYBE DO BOTH -- GIVE AN ORAL PRESENTATION, AND THAT'S HOW WE WILL CONTINUE TO NARROW DOWN UNTIL WE MAKE THE FINAL SELECTION. SINCE WE USE STATE AND FEDERAL DOLLARS, WE DO FOLLOW A STATE AND FEDERAL PROCESS, MAKING SURE TO FOLLOW ALL THE RULES SO THAT ALL FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR USE FOR THE CONSULTANTS. WHO ULTIMATELY SELECTS WILL BE YOU. THE MPO BOARD MAKES THE FINAL DECISION ON WHICH CONSULTANTS ARE SELECTED; HOWEVER, WE DO FORM A COMMITTEE, A SELECTION COMMITTEE, THAT WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR YOU. THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE WILL BE MADE UP OF STAFF FROM THE MPO, AND THEY HAVE NOT -- THIS COMMITTEE HAS NOT BEEN FORMED YET, BUT I SUSPECT IT'LL HAVE MEMBERS OF THE MPO STAFF, SOME OF THE AGENCIES THAT ARE REPRESENTED ON THIS BOARD AS WELL. THERE IS A SPECIFIC EVALUATION CRITERIA THAT'S USED TO RANK EACH STEP OF THE PROCESS, AND THE COMMITTEE MAKES THAT FINAL RECOMMENDATION, WHICH I WILL BRING BACK TO YOU AT YOUR AUGUST MEETING. AT THAT POINT WE MAKE TECHNICAL AND FEE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SELECTED CONSULTANTS, AND THAT TAKES ABOUT A MONTH, MAYBE TWO MONTHS, SO HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE ALL OUR NEW CONSULTANTS ONBOARD BY THE SEPTEMBER TIME FRAME WHEN THE OTHERS EXPIRE. JUST WANTED TO BRING THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION. IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. >>JOE AFFRONTI: ANY QUESTIONS? ANY COMMENTS? IF NOT, WE THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM KICKOFF, WALLY BLAIN. >>WALLY BLAIN: GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. WALLY BLAIN, MPO STAFF. BECAUSE OF THE TIME, I'M GOING TO CUT MY PRESENTATION SHORT AND IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, WE CAN DEAL WITH THAT. THIS IS A PROCESS THAT WE BEGAN SOMETIME AGO LAST YEAR WHEN WE LOOKED AT THE T.I.P. PRIORITY PROCESS AND HOW WE RANKED PROJECTS AND HOW WE TOOK APPLICATIONS AND SET PRIORITIES FOR FUNDING AND SPENDING. WORKING WITH D.O.T. AND OUR COMMITTEE STAFFS, LAST YEAR WE CAME UP WITH A NEW PROCESS WHERE ONCE THE LONG-RANGE PROCESS WAS ADOPTED, WE WOULD USE THE PRIORITIES COMING OUT OF THE LONG-RANGE PLAN TO DEVELOP PRIORITIES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET IS THREE DIFFERENT TABLES SUMMARIZING THE PROJECTS THAT ARE IN THE LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. THOSE THREE PROJECTS HIGHLIGHT PROJECTS THAT ARE ON THE STATE'S STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM. THAT SYSTEM IS A SYSTEM THAT WE COORDINATE AS THE MPO WITH D.O.T. THAT HAS STATEWIDE PRIORITIES FOR FUNDING. THE NEXT LIST IS SURFACE ARTERIALS THAT ARE NON -- SURFACE ARTERIALS, BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS, AND TRANSIT PROJECTS THAT ARE NOT ON THE STATE'S STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM. THIS WOULD BE THE REMAINDER OF THE OTHER STATE ARTERIALS WHERE WE COORDINATE WITH D.O.T. AS WELL AS THE FEDERAL MONEY THAT COMES IN THAT THE MPO ULTIMATELY SETS PRIORITY FOR. THE THIRD TABLE IS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM. THESE ARE -- IT'S A SPECIFIC CALL-DOWN IN THE FEDERAL LEGISLATION ABOUT WHAT THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IS, SO THESE ARE THOSE PROJECTS THAT IN THE PLAN WE'VE IDENTIFIED WOULD BE FUNDED OUT OF THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM. JUST TO HIGHLIGHT FOR YOU WHAT YOU DON'T SEE ON THESE PRIORITY LISTS BUT ARE INCLUDED IN THE LONG-RANGE PLAN, AND THOSE ARE PROJECTS THAT ARE FUNDED FROM LOCAL SOURCES. AS THE MPO, WE COORDINATE THAT AS WELL, BUT WE DO NOT HAVE A REQUIREMENT TO SET PRIORITIES FOR THOSE, SO WE WORK WITH THE LOCAL AGENCIES ON PUTTING THOSE PROJECTS IN THE LONG- RANGE PLAN AND SHOWING THOSE IN THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BASED ON THE LOCAL AGENCY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROCESS. SO YOU WON'T SEE A LOT OF THOSE LOCALLY FUNDED PROJECTS IN HERE JUST IN CASE YOU'RE LOOKING FOR THEM. THE WAY THIS WORKS NOW, WE WILL TAKE THESE LISTS AND COORDINATE IT WITH OUR PARTNERING AGENCIES THROUGH THE SUMMER AND DEVELOP PRIORITIES FOR SPENDING FOR THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. SO IT WILL BE BASED ON THE LONG-RANGE PLAN PROGRAM, LONG- RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN PRIORITIES, BUT IF THERE'S PROJECTS THAT THE LOCAL AGENCIES ARE WORKING ON AND CAN ADVANCE AND GET DONE SOONER, THEN CERTAINLY THAT WOULD TAKE A HIGHER PRIORITY AND GET DONE SOONER THAN OTHERS. SO WE WILL BRING THIS LIST OF PRIORITIES BACK TO YOU IN SEPTEMBER FOR YOUR ADOPTION AT A PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL. THEN IT WILL BE SENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR PROGRAMMING OF THOSE PRIORITIES. SO IF -- WITH THAT, IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I CAN ADDRESS THOSE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, WALLY. ANY QUESTIONS OF WALLY? IF NOT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. >>WALLY BLAIN: THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANKS, WALLY. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT, LIVABLE ROADWAYS COMMITTEE, MS. SAUL- SENA. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THE LIVABLE ROADWAYS COMMITTEE MET ON APRIL 28th. WE HEARD THE T.I.P. REPORT THAT WALLY JUST REFERRED TO, AND WE WERE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE ENHANCEMENT FUNDING AS THE TERM USED TO DISCUSS BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO SEEM AS IF IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS PERIPHERAL AND NOT CENTRAL, AND PART OF OUR DISCUSSION -- AND I'D LIKE PERHAPS FOR OUR NEXT MEETING TO SHARE THIS WITH ALL OF YOU. THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, CAME OUT WITH A NEW STATEMENT IN MARCH THAT WAS SIGNED AND PASSED ALONG TO EVERYONE. IT'S A POLICY STATEMENT, AND IT SAYS THAT IT'S FDOT POLICY -- NOT FDOT, THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY TO INCORPORATE SAFE AND CONVENIENT WALKING AND BICYCLING FACILITIES INTO TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, AND EVERY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO IMPROVE CONDITIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THIS, AND ONE OF THE QUOTES IN HERE, WHICH WAS INTERESTING, IS, CONSIDERING WALKING AND BICYCLING AS EQUALS WITH OTHER TRANSPORTATION MODES, WHICH IS A REAL SHIFT. I MEAN, THIS IS A HUGE, HUGE, HUGE PARADIGM SHIFT IN THE FEDERAL REGULATIONS, AND I'M SURE IT WILL DRIFT DOWN BECAUSE OF FUNDING TO STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. SO IT -- IT REQUIRES US ALL TO THINK DIFFERENTLY IN HOW WE CONSIDER FUNDING AND RANKING PROJECTS. THIS IS THE CONCEPT OF COMPLETE STREETS, WHICH OUR LIVABLE ROADWAYS COMMITTEE HAS BEEN PROMOTING FOR OVER A DECADE. SO WE ARE CONCERNED THAT WE IN OUR LOCAL MPO THINK THROUGH EVERYTHING WITH THIS ENHANCED VISION OF COMPLETE STREETS RATHER THAN THINKING OF BICYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS AS -- AS PERIPHERAL. AND THE OTHER COMPONENT THAT'S KEY AND IT WAS IDENTIFIED EARLIER IS THAT WE NEED TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE SAFETY ISSUES, AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S IN OUR LIST OF THINGS TO DO, BUT I CAN PROMISE YOU THAT THE LIVABLE ROADWAYS COMMITTEE WILL BE MAKING SURE THAT WE ACTUALLY DO THIS BECAUSE WE CAN BUILD FACILITIES, BUT UNLESS PEOPLE FEEL COMFORTABLE AND SAFE USING THEM, THEN IT'S TO NO AVAIL. ONE OF THE PREMISES OF ALL THE COMP PLANS THAT WE HAVE ALL ADOPTED IN OUR MUNICIPALITIES AND IN THE COUNTY IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DESIGN, BUT FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE LAND USE DECISIONS MADE THAT WAY AND TRANSPORTATION DECISIONS MADE THAT WAY, THERE HAS TO BE A SENSE OF SAFETY THAT'S -- THAT UNDERSCORES THE ENTIRE PACKAGE. SECONDLY, WE REVIEWED EXISTING CONDITIONS ON BUSCH BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARMENIA AND NORTH BOULEVARD. ARMENIA NORTH -- SOUTH BUSCH DO NOT HAVE SIDEWALKS, WHICH MAKES TRAVEL FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES DANGEROUS. ONE OF OUR MEMBERS, ARIZONA JENKINS, WHO'S IN A WHEELCHAIR, UNDERSCORED THE DIFFICULTY, AND THE CITY AND THE COUNTY ARE GOING TO WORK TOGETHER TO TRY TO ADDRESS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS, WHICH ARE PRETTY APPALLING. AND LASTLY, THE LIVABLE ROADWAYS COMMITTEE ASKED THAT THE MPO SUPPORT A MOTION TO THE CITIES OF TAMPA, TEMPLE TERRACE, PLANT CITY, AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY REQUESTING THAT THEY DO NOT WAIVE SIDEWALKS IN THE REZONING OR BUILDING PROCESS. IT SEEMS THAT OFTEN WHEN WE APPROVE ZONINGS, THE SIDEWALKS ARE PART OF THE PLAN THAT'S ADOPTED, BUT LATER IN THE IMPLEMENTATION, THE STAFFS WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT JUST KIND OF PEREMPTORILY, AND WE AS THE ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO CREATE THE POLICIES THAT SAY THAT THE SIDEWALKS NEED TO BE THERE DON'T KNOW UNTIL THREE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD WHEN SOMEBODY COMPLAINS THAT THEY'RE STUCK, SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE MPO REQUEST THAT THESE JURISDICTIONS NOT WAIVE SIDEWALKS IN THE REZONING OR BUILDING PROCESS. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >>MARK SHARPE: SECOND. >>JOE AFFRONTI: MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES] OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: THANK YOU. AND LASTLY, OUR COMMITTEE WAS TOLD THAT FDOT, THE CITY OF TAMPA, AND CSX ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO MAKE RAIL CROSSINGS AT ARMENIA AND BUSCH ACCESSIBLE, AND WE WANT TO COMMEND THE CITY, FDOT, AND CSX FOR WORKING TOGETHER TO MAKE OUR COMMUNITY A MORE LIVABLE PLACE. AND OUR NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR MAY 26th AT 9:00 A.M., AND EVERYBODY'S INVITED. THANK YOU. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. SAUL-SENA. NEXT WE HAVE THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE, MICHELE OGILVIE. >>MICHELE OGILVIE: THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MET ON APRIL 14th. THE COMMITTEE RECEIVED A PRESENTATION ON HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY'S CANDIDATE PROJECTS BEING INCLUDED IN THE REFERENDUM. CHAIR TINA RUSSO STATED, AND I QUOTE, THAT ALTHOUGH HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY GETS A BAD REPUTATION FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE FACILITY, SHE IS AWARE THAT IT COULD BE MUCH HIGHER IF NOT FOR THE GREAT THINGS THAT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY STAFFS ARE DOING AND HAVE DONE WITH SIDEWALKS, SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS, AND BIKE LANES. RAIL COULD BE THE TIPPING POINT FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ON A MUCH LARGER SCALE. THE COMMITTEE HAS A DRAFT VISION, MISSION, AND OPERATING VALUE TO PROCEED -- TO PROCEED WITH ITS COMPLETE STREETS FOCUS. IT IS A WALKABLE-, TRANSIT-, AND BICYCLE-ORIENTED STREETS AND SIDEWALKS THAT SAFELY AND COMFORTABLY ACCOMMODATE USERS OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES. WE DO THIS WORK BY CONVENING, ENGAGING, MOBILIZING, AND SUPPORTING TO ENSURE WE ALL HAVE THE MEANS TO ADVANCE DESIGNS AND STANDARDS THAT IMPROVE THE APPEARANCE, SAFETY, AND ACCESSIBILITY OF STREETS, PROTECT NEIGHBORHOODS FROM EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC, AND REMOVE DANGEROUS CONDITIONS FOR BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS. WE WILL ACHIEVE OUR MISSION WITH RESPECT. THE NEXT BPAC MEETING WILL BE HELD AT 5:30 ON MAY 12th AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOARDROOM. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR MICHELE? IF NOT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MICHELE. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED COORDINATING BOARD. THE TDCB HELD ITS ANNUAL PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 22nd, AND NO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ADDRESSED OR WISHED TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD PROCEEDED WITH ITS REGULAR MEETING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING. THREE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ADDRESSED THE BOARD ON THE NEW FREEDOM PROJECT PRIORITIZATION LIST. EACH OF THE SPEAKERS REPRESENTING THE QUALITY OF LIFE SERVICES PROJECT URGED THE BOARD TO SEND A RECOMMENDATION THAT REQUESTS THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE REEXAMINE THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS AWARDED AND POSSIBLY CONSIDER A SMALLER OR PILOT PROJECT FOR THE SIXTH RANKED PROJECT, WHICH INCLUDES PROVIDING ACTUAL INCREASED OR NEW TRIP SERVICE TO THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. THE BOARD WITH THREE MEMBERS ABSTAINING ADOPTED A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS. THE BOARD FULLY SUPPORTED THE JRAC -- JARC PRIORITIZATION PROJECTS. THE BOARD ALSO RECEIVED A PRESENTATION ON HART'S TWO NEW FLEX SERVICES IN BRANDON AND SOUTH COUNTY. THE SERVICES PROVIDE ACCESS TO SHOPPING, RECREATION, WORK, AND LEARNING MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE EASY ACCESS TO AN AUTOMOBILE. FINALLY, THE BOARD WAS BRIEFED ON THE POSITIVE PROGRESS OF TRICOUNTY ACCESS CARD, THAT ALL THREE TRANSIT OPERATORS IN PASCO, HILLSBOROUGH, AND PINELLAS ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO PROVIDE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE TDC BOARD WILL BE ON JUNE 24th AT 9:15 IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOARDROOM, AND EVERYBODY'S WELCOME. OKAY. NOW WE HAVE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: OKAY. SORRY. YOU HAVE A LIST OF THE MEETINGS I'VE ATTENDED. I WANT TO MAKE A GENERAL STATEMENT ABOUT THEM. THE REASON THAT I GO TO A LOT OF THESE MEETINGS IS TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL THESE DIFFERENT AGENCIES WE DEAL WITH UNDERSTAND WHAT'S IN THE MPO PLAN AND HOW THEY CAN CONFORM TO IT AND I CAN HAVE PARTICIPATION IN WHAT THEY'RE DOING TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL KIND OF ON TRACK IN IMPLEMENTING OUR LONG-RANGE PLAN, SO GENERALLY SPEAKING THE MEETINGS I ATTENDED TO WAS FOR THAT PURPOSE. OTHER THINGS I'VE DONE, I WENT TO THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE AND IMMERSED MYSELF IN LEARNING EVERYTHING I COULD ABOUT HIGH-SPEED RAIL, WHICH WAS VERY VALUABLE. I THINK I HAVE A MUCH CLEARER UNDERSTANDING OF HOW IT ALL WORKS, AND WE CERTAINLY ARE WORKING WITH HART AND EVERYBODY TO MAKE SURE THIS IS ALL COORDINATED HERE IN TAMPA. I WILL TELL YOU THE REST OF THE COUNTRY IS VERY JEALOUS OF US AND CAN'T BELIEVE THAT WE GOT AWARDED THAT GRANT, AND WE ARE SCHEDULED TO BE THE FIRST, BEATING CALIFORNIA, TO HAVING THE FIRST OPERATING SYSTEM, MUCH TO THEIR DISCOMFORT, BUT THAT -- THAT IS THE REALITY. WE ARE AHEAD OF EVERYBODY ON THIS, SO THAT'S AN IMPORTANT THING THAT WE -- WE DO THIS RIGHT. I'VE BEEN SPEAKING TO ARCHITECTURAL GROUPS, ENGINEERS AT FDOT. THEY HAD ABOUT 200 OF THEIR CONSULTANTS AT A LARGE MEETING WHERE I PRESENTED THE MPO PLAN RECENTLY. THE CCC, THE CHAIRMAN'S COORDINATING COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONAL MPOs, WE'VE BEEN DOING A LOT OF WORK GETTING OUR PLAN TOGETHER AND A BROCHURE'S GOING TO BE COMING OUT WITH THAT. WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT OUR NEW NEWSLETTER'S OUT. IT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET. ALSO THE LIST OF THE AWARDS THAT YOU HAVE THERE. WANT TO REMIND THE BOARD THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A JULY MPO MEETING. I KNOW THE BOARD AND I BELIEVE CITY COUNCIL ARE BOTH ON VACATION AT THAT TIME, AND IT WOULD BE JULY 6th, SO WE'VE CANCELED THAT MEETING. WE TYPICALLY DO THAT. LAST YEAR WE WENT AHEAD AND HAD THE MEETING BECAUSE WE WERE WORKING ON THE PLAN AND NEEDED TO, BUT WE FEEL LIKE WE CAN GO BACK TO NOT HAVING THE JULY MEETING, SO THAT'S JUST A REMINDER. NEXT MPO MEETING WILL BE JUNE 1st AT 9:00 A.M. HERE AT THE BOCC CHAMBERS. NEXT POLICY COMMITTEE WILL BE HELD MAY 18th AT THE -- ON THE 18th FLOOR AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I'LL REMIND YOU AGAIN ABOUT THE MAY 13th MEETING AT 6:00 P.M. ON THE REFERENDUM. THAT'S AN IMPORTANT MEETING. AND WE HAD A REQUEST FOR SOME INFORMATION ON HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY'S INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. WE'RE GOING TO DO THAT AT THE NEXT MONTH'S MPO BOARD MEETING AND ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED BY MAYOR LOTT. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THANK YOU, MR. CHIARAMONTE. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: MARK HAS A QUESTION. >>JOE AFFRONTI: OKAY. MR. SHARPE. >>MARK SHARPE: IS THERE ANY -- I KNOW THAT YOU LED A GROUP TO CHARLOTTE, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS REAL HELPFUL IN HAVING AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE SYSTEM, TALK TO THE OPERATORS, TALK TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TEAM S THERE ANY -- IS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION -- I UNDERSTOOD THERE WAS A CONVERSATION ABOUT PERHAPS GOING TO PHOENIX. IS THAT GOING TO TAKE PLACE, DO YOU KNOW? >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: I DON'T THINK THAT THE MPO HAD BEEN PLANNING THAT. I BELIEVE THERE IS A TRIP TO PHOENIX, AND IT'S PROBABLY I WANT TO SAY BY THE CHAMBER, BUT I'M NOT SURE. I CAN LOOK INTO EXACTLY WHO IS DOING THAT. >>RICHARD WAINIO: I JUST -- I'M ON THE BOARD OF THE CHAMBER. I JUST ATTENDED THEIR MEETING A FEW DAYS AGO UP AT MOSI, AND THEY ARE PLANNING A TRIP, THE GREATER TAMPA CHAMBER'S PLANNING A TRIP TO PHOENIX. >>MARK SHARPE: OKAY. SO IT'S THE CHAMBER? >>RICHARD WAINIO: YEAH, IT IS THE CHAMBER. I BELIEVE IT'S LATE IN THE SUMMER OR SEPTEMBER, AUGUST- SEPTEMBER, WHICH IF THAT'S TRUE AND YOU WANT TO GO 115- DEGREE HEAT, BUT THEY ARE PLANNING IT. I'D CHECK WITH -- WITH THE CHAMBER IF YOU'RE INTERESTED. >>MARK SHARPE: WELL, I WAS CURIOUS. YOU KNOW, PHOENIX -- ONE OF THE REASONS THAT FOLKS HAVE SAID IN THE PAST THAT OUR TRANSIT SYSTEM WOULDN'T WORK IS THE HEAT, AND THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF HEAT, AND THEIR SYSTEM SEEMS TO WORK. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK OUR -- OUR -- RAY, IF YOU WOULD COMMUNICATE WITH THE -- IT'S THE GOLDWATER INSTITUTE WHICH ACTUALLY HAS BEEN PUBLISHING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO LIGHT RAIL. I'VE READ ALMOST ALL OF THEM, BUT THE ONLY DOCUMENT I CAN FIND SINCE THE LIGHT RAIL SYSTEMS BEGUN TO OPERATE IS A TWO-WORD STATEMENT WHICH SAYS TO THE EFFECT OF IT WORKS. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: WOW. [LAUGHTER] >>MARK SHARPE: I'VE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND -- AND IT WAS A BEGRUDGING -- IN FACT, THE STATEMENT WAS, WE REALLY DON'T WANT TO HAVE TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT THE PAST, BUT IT WORKS. WELL, I'D LIKE MORE BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE THE ARGUMENT AGAINST IT IS THE SAME. EVERYWHERE YOU GO, EVERY COMMUNITY THAT'S EVER HAD THIS CONVERSATION, IT'S THE EXACT SAME CASE, THE EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS, THE EXACT SAME POINTS, AND REALLY THE EXACT SAME PEOPLE, RANDALL O'TOOLE, WENDELL COX, SAME GROUP, AND SO THEY'RE USING THESE STATEMENTS HERE AS WELL, SO IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL FOR US, GOOD AND BAD, TO REALLY HAVE A, YOU KNOW, ASSESSMENT. I DON'T NEED TO GO ACTUALLY RIDE THE PHOENIX SYSTEM, BUT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR THOSE WHO DO TO COME BACK AND GIVE US A REPORT AND GET A CLEAR-EYED ASSESSMENT OF, YOU KNOW, THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES AND AS WELL THIS WHOLE ISSUE OF HEAT BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING PEOPLE -- WHEN PEOPLE TALK ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO USE IT, THEY STRESS THE FACT THAT WE SEEM TO BE UNUSUAL AND NOT LIKE ANY OTHER COMMUNITY THAT -- >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: ONE OF THE THINGS THEY DID DO IN PHOENIX IS THE WAY THEY BUILT THEIR SHELTERS, THEY CAN ACTUALLY CHANGE. IT'S LIKE KIND OF A VENTING KIND OF ROOF, AND THEY CAN CHANGE IT DURING THE YEAR TO CONFORM TO HOW IT WOULD GET THE MOST SHADE AS THE SUN MOVES TO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, SO THEY'RE VERY CREATIVE. >>JOE AFFRONTI: THERE WAS ALSO AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE IN EITHER SATURDAY OR SUNDAY'S PAPER ABOUT THE EFFECT OF LIGHT RAIL IN ST. LOUIS -- >>MARK SHARPE: SAW THAT. >>JOE AFFRONTI: -- AND HOW POSITIVE THAT'S BEEN FOR THEM, SO THAT WAS WORTHWHILE READING. OKAY. ANYONE THAT WANTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON ANY ITEMS? IF NOT, IN CLOSING I JUST WANT TO THANK RAY CHIARAMONTE BECAUSE HE'S THE ONE THAT HAS BEEN SO INVOLVED AND HAS DONE SO MANY THINGS AND ATTENDED SO MANY MEETINGS THAT I FEEL WAS REALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR US GETTING THE AWARD FOR THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN FROM THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL - - OR FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, SO THANK YOU, RAY, FOR ALL THAT YOU DO. >>RAY CHIARAMONTE: THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: HEAR! HEAR! [APPLAUSE] >>JOE AFFRONTI: WITH THAT WE ADJOURN. >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: WELL DESERVED. 1